Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis of intermediate surgical risk in Singapore
- PMID: 35927703
- PMCID: PMC9354430
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08369-5
Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis of intermediate surgical risk in Singapore
Abstract
Objective: The objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis with intermediate surgical risk in Singapore.
Methods: A de novo Markov model with three health states - stroke with long-term sequelae, no stroke, and death - was developed and simulated using Monte Carlo simulations with 10,000 iterations over a five-year time horizon from the Singapore healthcare system perspective. A 3% annual discount rate for costs and outcomes and monthly cycle lengths were used. By applying the longest available published clinical evidence, simulated patients received either TAVI or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and were at risk of adverse events (AEs) such as moderate-to-severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR).
Results: When five-year PARTNER 2A data was applied, base-case analyses showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for TAVI compared to SAVR was US$315,760 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The high ICER was due to high incremental implantation and procedure costs of TAVI compared to SAVR, and marginal improvement of 0.10 QALYs as simulated mortality of TAVI exceeded SAVR at 3.75 years post-implantation. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the ICERs were most sensitive to cost of PAR, utility values of SAVR patients, and cost of TAVI and SAVR implants and procedures. When disutilities for AEs were additionally applied, the ICER decreased to US$300,070 per QALY gained. TAVI was dominated by SAVR when the time horizon increased to 20 years. Clinical outcomes projected from one-year PARTNER S3i data further reduced the ICER to US$86,337 per QALY gained for TAVI, assuming early all-cause mortality benefits from TAVI continued to persist. This assumption was undermined when longer term data showed that TAVI's early mortality benefits diminished at five years.
Limitations and conclusion: TAVI is unlikely to be cost-effective in intermediate surgical-risk patients compared to SAVR in Singapore.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Singapore; TAVI; TAVR; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
H.K. and I.K. received honoraria as speakers from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. All other authors declared no competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in Chinese patients with intermediate and high surgical risk for aortic stenosis: a decision analysis on effect, affordability and cost-effectiveness.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 18;14(11):e082283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082283. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39557556 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in the intermediate surgical risk population.Int J Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;294:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.057. Epub 2019 Jun 21. Int J Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31255453
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Intermediate and Low Risk Severe Aortic Stenosis Patients in Singapore.Ann Acad Med Singap. 2020 Jul;49(7):423-433. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2020. PMID: 33000105 Clinical Trial.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Nov 2;20(14):1-148. eCollection 2020. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020. PMID: 33240455 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(2):1-121. eCollection 2020. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020. PMID: 32194880 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in Chinese patients with intermediate and high surgical risk for aortic stenosis: a decision analysis on effect, affordability and cost-effectiveness.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 18;14(11):e082283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082283. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39557556 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Heart Association. Aortic Stenosis Overview. 2020; https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/heart-valve-problems-and-disease/... Accessed 2020 Mar 4
-
- National Heart Centre Singapore. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) - An alternative treatment for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis patients. 2017; https://www.singhealth.com.sg/news/medical-news/transcatheter-aortic-val... Accessed 2020 Mar 4
-
- Tay ELW, Lew PS, Poh KK, Saclolo R, Chia B-L, Yeo TC, et al. Demographics of severe valvular aortic stenosis in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2013 Jan;54(1):36–9. 10.11622/smedj.2013009 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources