Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 17;11(3):254-258.
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723949. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Practice Patterns of Central Venous Catheter Placement and Confirmation in Pediatric Critical Care

Ahmed Veten  1 , Joshua Davis  2 , Robert Kavanagh  3 , Neal Thomas  4 , Adrian Zurca  5
Affiliations

Practice Patterns of Central Venous Catheter Placement and Confirmation in Pediatric Critical Care

Ahmed Veten et al. J Pediatr Intensive Care. .

Abstract

Optimal practices for the placement of central venous catheters (CVCs) in critically ill children are unclear. This study describes the clinical practice of pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) providers regarding CVC placement, including site selection, confirmation practices and assessment of complications. Two-hundred fourteen PCCM providers responded to an electronic survey, including 170 (79%) attending physicians, 30 (14%) fellow physicians, and 14 (7%) advanced practice providers. PCCM providers most commonly place internal jugular (IJ) and femoral CVCs, with subclavian CVCs and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) placed less commonly (IJ 99%, femoral 95%, subclavian 40%, PICC 19%). The IJ is the most preferred site (128/214 (60%)); decreased infection risk is the most common reason for preferring this site. The subclavian is the least preferred site (150/214 [70%]) due to concern for increased risk of complications (51%) and personal discomfort with the procedure (49%). One-hundred twenty-six (59%) of respondents reported receiving formal ultrasound (US) or echocardiography training. Respondents reported using dynamic US guidance for placement in 90% of IJ, 86% of PICC, 78% of femoral, and 12% of subclavian CVCs. Plain radiography (X-ray) was the most preferred modality for confirming CVC tip position (85%) compared with US (9%) and no imaging (5%). Most providers reported using X-ray to evaluate for pneumothorax following upper extremity CVC placement, with only 5% reporting use of US and none relying on physical exam alone. This study demonstrates wide variability in PCCM providers' CVC placement practices. Potential training gaps exist for placement of subclavian catheters and use of US.

Keywords: central venous catheter; education; pediatric critical care; pneumothorax; ultrasound; vascular access.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None declared.

References

    1. Shaffner D H. 5th edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016. Textbook of Pediatric Intensive Care.
    1. Corporation R.Pediatric Toolkit for Using the AHRQ Quality Indicators Selected Best Practices and Suggestions for Improvement Pediatric Toolkit for Using the AHRQ Quality Indicators Best Processes/Systems of Care Introduction: Essential First Steps 2008;(Cvc):1–8
    1. 3SITES Study Group . Parienti J J, Mongardon N, Mégarbane B. Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1220–1229. - PubMed
    1. Marik P E, Flemmer M, Harrison W. The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheters as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(08):2479–2485. - PubMed
    1. Derderian S C, Good R, Vuille-Dit-Bille R N, Carpenter T, Bensard D D. Central venous lines in critically ill children: thrombosis but not infection is site dependent. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(09):1740–1743. - PubMed