Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;2(2):178-188.
doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2014.08.006.

Epidemiology and spatial examination of bicycle-motor vehicle crashes in Iowa, 2001-2011

Affiliations

Epidemiology and spatial examination of bicycle-motor vehicle crashes in Iowa, 2001-2011

Cara Hamann et al. J Transp Health. 2015.

Abstract

Purpose: To identify how person, crash, environment, and population characteristics differ between bicycle-motor vehicle crashes that occur at intersections and non-intersections.

Methods: The Iowa Department of Transportation crash database for the years 2001 through 2011 was used to identify bicycle-motor vehicle (BMV) crashes and associated person, crash, and environment characteristics. Population-level data were drawn from the 2010 U.S. Census and the 2010 American Community Survey. Descriptive statistics, GIS mapping, and multivariable logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with crash risk and crash location.

Results: Compared to intersections, non-intersection BMV crashes had higher odds of involving young bicyclists (<10 years old; OR: 1.8, 95%CI: 1.2-2.6), location outside city limits (OR: 5.7, 95%CI: 3.9-8.3), with driver vision obscured (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2-1.8), reduced lighting on roadway (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.5-2.4), and lower odds when the bicyclist (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3-0.6) or motorist (OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4-0.8) failed to yield right of way.

Conclusions: Environmental factors, as well as developmental (age) and behavioral factors of bicycle-motor vehicle crashes vary by location (intersection/non-intersection). Results from this study can be used to tailor and target multiple intervention approaches, such as making infrastructure changes, increasing safety behavior among both motorists and bicyclists, and identifying which age groups and locations would most benefit from intervention.

Keywords: bicycling; environment; epidemiology; public health; traffic accidents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Annual average crash rate by zip code tabulation area, per 10,000 population, Iowa, 2001-2011
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Distribution of bicycle-motor vehicle crashes by population density, stratified by intersection and non-intersection, selected counties, Iowa, 2001-2011

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alliance for Biking & Walking. Bicycling and walking in the United States: 2012. benchmarking report Available at: www.peoplepoweredmovement.org/benchmarking. Accessed June 5, 2012.
    1. Beck LF, Dellinger AM, O'Neil ME. Motor vehicle crash injury rates by mode of travel, united states: Using exposure-based methods to quantify differences. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(2):212–218. - PubMed
    1. Delmelle EC, Thill JC, Ha HH. Spatial epidemiologic analysis of relative collision risk factors among urban bicyclists and pedestrians. Transportation. 2012;39(2):433–448.
    1. Demelle EC, Thill JC. Urban bicyclists: Spatial analysis of adult and youth traffic hazard intensity. Transport Res Rec. 2008; 2074:31–39.
    1. Edwards P, Green J, Lachowycz K, Grundy C, Roberts I. Serious injuries in children: variation by area deprivation and settlement type. Archives of disease in childhood. 2008. Jun;93(6):485–9. PubMed PMID: 18381345. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources