Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 8;7(5):100959.
doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100959. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.

Lymphocyte Depletion Rate as a Biomarker of Radiation Dose to Circulating Lymphocytes During Fractionated Partial-Body Radiation Therapy

Affiliations

Lymphocyte Depletion Rate as a Biomarker of Radiation Dose to Circulating Lymphocytes During Fractionated Partial-Body Radiation Therapy

Susannah G Ellsworth et al. Adv Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Radiation causes exponential depletion of circulating lymphocyte populations; in turn, radiation-induced lymphopenia is associated with worse survival for many solid tumors, possibly owing to attenuated antitumor immune responses. Identifying reliable and reproducible methods of calculating the radiation dose to circulating immune cells may facilitate development of techniques to reduce the risk and severity of radiation-induced toxic effects to circulating lymphocytes.

Methods and materials: Patient-specific lymphocyte loss rates were derived from a clinical data set including 684 adult patients with solid tumors. Multivariable linear regression was used to model the relationship between the lymphocyte loss rate and physical parameters of the radiation plan that determine circulating blood dose.

Results: During partial-body radiation, lymphocyte loss rates are determined by physical parameters of the radiation plan that reflect radiation exposure to circulating cells, including target volume size, dose per fraction squared, and anatomic site treated. Differences in observed versus predicted lymphocyte loss rates may be partly explained by variations in concurrent chemotherapy regimens.

Conclusions: We describe a novel method of using patient-specific lymphocyte loss kinetics to approximate the effective radiation dose to circulating lymphocytes during focal fractionated photon radiation therapy. Clinical applications of these findings include the early identification of patients at particularly high risk of severe radiation-induced lymphopenia based on physical parameters of the radiation therapy plan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Figure 1
Scatterplot of the lymphocyte decay constant versus the product of the dose per fraction and PTV-to-blood-volume ratio. Note abdominal SBRT cases (blue circles), which have a much higher decay constant for similar dose/volume relationships compared with patients receiving conventional fractionation. Abbreviations: PTV = planning target volume; RT = radiation therapy; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Fig 2
Figure 2
Scatterplot showing the linear relationship between the lymphocyte decay constant versus the product of the dose per fraction squared and the PTV-to-blood-volume ratio. Interindividual variability in b for the same combinations of dose/fraction2 and PTV:blood volume is observed. Abbreviations: CNS = central nervous system; H+N = head and neck; PTV = planning target volume; RT = radiation therapy; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Fig 3
Figure 3
Box plot correlating lnPTV with percent-per-fraction lymphocyte loss rates. The PTV size associated with a particular per-fraction lymphocyte loss rate range (displayed in increments of 5% on the x-axis) varies considerably depending on the body site irradiated and the treatment technique (SBRT vs non-SBRT). The large difference in loss rates seen with SBRT plans likely reflects the higher dose per fraction given during SBRT. Abbreviations: CNS = central nervous system; FLL = per-fraction lymphocyte loss; H+N= head and neck; PTV = planning target volume; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Fig 4
Figure 4
Scatterplot of observed versus predicted decay constants, based on the product of the planning target volume:blood volume ratio and the square of the dose per fraction, adjusted for the site treated and the chemotherapy regimen (Equation 6). Abbreviation: CNS = central nervous system.

References

    1. Pan HY, Haffty BG, Falit BP, et al. Supply and demand for radiation oncology in the United States: Updated projections for 2015 to 2025. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:493–500. - PubMed
    1. Grassberger C, Ellsworth SG, Wilks MQ, Keane FK, Loeffler JS. Assessing the interactions between radiotherapy and antitumour immunity. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16:729–745. - PubMed
    1. Grossman SA, Ellsworth S, Campian J, et al. Survival in patients with severe lymphopenia following treatment with radiation and chemotherapy for newly diagnosed solid tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13:1225–1231. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parikh F, Duluc D, Imai N, et al. Chemoradiotherapy-induced upregulation of PD-1 antagonizes immunity to HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer. Cancer Res. 2014;74:7205–7216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen D, Verma V, Patel RR, Barsoumian HB, Cortez MA, Welsh JW. Absolute lymphocyte count predicts abscopal responses and outcomes in patients receiving combined immunotherapy and radiation therapy: Analysis of 3 phase 1/2 trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;108:196–203. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources