Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 6:9:rbac047.
doi: 10.1093/rb/rbac047. eCollection 2022.

In vitro and in vivo studies on bacteria and encrustation resistance of heparin/poly-L-lysine-Cu nanoparticles coating mediated by PDA for ureteral stent application

Affiliations

In vitro and in vivo studies on bacteria and encrustation resistance of heparin/poly-L-lysine-Cu nanoparticles coating mediated by PDA for ureteral stent application

Bukola O Awonusi et al. Regen Biomater. .

Abstract

Ureteral stents are commonly utilized as a medical device to aid the flow of urine. However, biofilm formation and encrustation complications have been clinical problems. To overcome this challenge, heparin/poly-L-lysine-copper (Hep/PLL-Cu) nanoparticle was immobilized on a dopamine-coated polyurethane surface (PU/NPs). The stability and structural properties of the nanoparticles were characterized by Zeta potential, poly dispersion index, transmission electron microscopy, atom force microscopy and contact angle. The surface composition, antibacterial potency, encrustation resistance rate and biocompatibility of PU/NPs were investigated by scanning electron microscope, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, antibacterial assay and MTS assay, respectively. In addition, the anti-encrustation property was studied by implanting coated NPs stents in the rat bladder for 7 days. It was shown that the size and distribution of Hep/PLL-Cu nanoparticles were uniform. PU/NPs could inhibit Proteus mirabilis proliferation and biofilm formation, and exhibit no cytotoxicity. Less encrustation (Ca and Mg salt) was deposited both in vitro and in vivo on samples, demonstrating that the NPs coating could be a potential surface modification method of ureteral material for clinical use.

Keywords: biofilm; encrustation; nanoparticles; ureteral stents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic drawing of the preparation and immobilization process of NPs on PU/PDA.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
TEM images of prepared nanoparticle.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
SEM images for (a) PU, (b) PU/PDA, (c) NPs.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
(a–c) 3D dimensional AFM images for PU, PU/PDA and NPs; (d) surface roughness of samples, data were presented as mean and standard deviation (n = 3, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
(a) XPS wide scan of spectra; (b) PU high-resolution spectra of N1s; (c) PU/PDA high-resolution spectra of N1s; (d) NPs high-resolution spectra of N1s; (e) S2p high-resolution spectra; and (f) high-resolution spectra of Cu2p.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Water contact angles and droplet images of water.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Cumulative releases of heparin and Cu ions from NPs immobilized surface (n = 3).
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Cells proliferation rates of different samples cultured for 1, 3 and 5 days. Data were presented as mean and standard deviation (n = 3, △P 0.05).
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
Bacterial colonies counts in the AU solution after incubating with different samples for 24 h, (a) PU, (b) PU/PDA, (c) NPs, (d) antibacterial rates of different samples in AU solution. Data were presented as mean and standard deviation (n = 3, *P <0.05).
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
(a) Merge fluorescent images indicating live and dead bacteria on samples after 24 h coculture, (b) proportion of live and dead bacteria.
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
SEM micrographs of different samples immersed in AU solution for 2, 4 and 6 weeks.
Figure 12.
Figure 12.
(a) Encrustation weight, Ca (b) and Mg (c) contents of different samples after immersions in AU solution for 2, 4 and 6 weeks, *P 0.05, △P 0.05.
Figure 13.
Figure 13.
Encrustations of the ureteral stents after 7 days implantation, (a) photo of implanted PU stent, (b) SEM image of implanted PU stent, (c) SEM micrograph of encrustation, (d) EDS spectra at encrustation site, (e) photo of implanted nanoparticles stent, (f) SEM image of implanted nanoparticles stent, Ca (g) and Mg (h) deposition amounts on nanoparticles and PU ureteral stent after 7 days of implantation (n = 3, *P <0.05).
Figure 14.
Figure 14.
Mechanism of Hep/PLL-Cu (NPs) stent, (a) PU stent, (b) release of Cu ions from the NPs killing majority of the urease-producing bacteria on NPs, (c) release of SO3 − group from heparin molecule blocks the crystal growth sites hereby reducing the formation of urine crystals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sali GM, Joshi HB.. Ureteric stents: overview of current clinical applications and economic implications. Int J Urol 2020;27:7–15. - PubMed
    1. Donahue RP, Stamm AW, Gibbons RP, Porter CR, Kobashi KC, Corman JM, Lee UJ.. Evolution of the ureteral stent: the pivotal role of the gibbons ureteral catheter. J Urol 2018;115:3–7. - PubMed
    1. Hasirci N, Aksoy EA.. Synthesis and modifications of polyurethanes for biomedical purposes. High Perform Polym 2007;19:621–37.
    1. Wang Y, Hong Q, Chen Y, Lian X, Xiong Y.. Surface properties of polyurethanes modified by bioactive polysaccharide-based polyelectrolyte multilayers. Colloids Surf B 2012;100:77–83. - PubMed
    1. Gorman SP, Jones DS, Bonner MC, Akay M, Keane PF.. Mechanical performance of polyurethane ureteral stents in vitro and ex vivo. Biomaterials 1997;18:1379–83. - PubMed