Translucency parameter and color masking ability of CAD-CAM denture base materials against metal substrates

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the translucency parameters of traditional, milled, and 3D-printed denture base materials at 3 different thicknesses and the color masking ability of each material against a metallic background between different thicknesses.

Material and methods: A traditional heat-polymerizing polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (H-Lucitone) material was used as the control group. Two milled pre-polymerized resin blocks (M-Lucitone and IvoBase) and five 3D-printed denture base materials (P-Lucitone, Dentca LP, Dentca OP, Formlabs, and Kulzer) were used as experimental groups. A total of 240 samples, (n = 30, per material) were fabricated to a final specimen dimension of 12×12 mm and in thicknesses of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mm (n = 10 per thickness/material) according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The color coordinates (L*, a*, b*) in CIELab color space for all specimens placed against a white, black, and metallic background were measured with a spectrophotometer. The translucency parameters (TP₀₀ ) at each thickness and the color differences between 1 mm and 2 mm (dE_00M1-2 ) and between 2 mm and 3 mm (dE_00M2-3 ) against the metallic background were calculated with the CIEDE2000 color matrix. Comparisons between the groups for differences in TP₀₀ were made using One-way ANOVA separately for each thickness. Comparisons of groups and materials for differences in dE_00M1-2 and dE_00M2-3 were made using Two-way ANOVA and Fisher's Protected Least Significant Differences (α = 0.05).

Results: The TP₀₀ decreased with increasing thickness in all 8 material groups. All 3D-printed materials, except P-Lucitone, had higher TP₀₀ than milled pre-polymerized resin materials (M-Lucitone and IvoBase), and traditional heat-polymerizing PMMA (H-Lucitone) material (P<.001) at all thicknesses. In the 1 mm and 2 mm thickness, heat-polymerizing acrylic resin (H-Lucitone) had the lowest TP₀₀ , and in the 3 mm thickness, milled acrylic resin (M-Lucitone and IVOBase) had had lowest TP₀₀ (p < 0.001). All material groups had significantly lower values of dE_00M2-3 than dE_00M1-2 (p < 0.001). The color differences dE_00M2-3 were significantly lower in H-Lucitone, M-Lucitone, P-Lucitone, and IvoBase groups than in other materials, while the color difference of dE_00M1-2 was significantly lower in H-Lucitone, P-Lucitone and Dentca LP than other materials (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The results from this study provide clinicians and dental technicians with information regarding the selection of denture base materials to achieve desired color masking outcomes, according to available prosthetic space. Thicker prostheses significantly improved the color masking abilities of denture acrylic resins against a metallic background. In a thickness of 1 and 2 mm, the heat-polymerizing acrylic resin had a lower translucency parameter and better color masking ability. When the prosthesis thickness reached 3 mm, the milled acrylic resin had a lower translucency parameter and better color masking ability. When compared to the heat-polymerizing resin and milled acrylic resin materials, except for one 3D-printing resin (P-Lucitone), the color masking abilities of the remaining 3D-printing resin materials were low, regardless of prosthesis thickness.

Keywords: 3D-printing; heat-polymerizing; milling; optical properties; removable dental prostheses.