Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Aug 16;11(16):e025425.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025425. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

Repeated Measures of Modified Rankin Scale Scores to Assess Functional Recovery From Stroke: AFFINITY Study Findings

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Repeated Measures of Modified Rankin Scale Scores to Assess Functional Recovery From Stroke: AFFINITY Study Findings

Alexander Chye et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Function after acute stroke using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is usually assessed at a point in time. The analytical implications of serial mRS measurements to evaluate functional recovery over time is not completely understood. We compare repeated-measures and single-measure analyses of the mRS from a randomized clinical trial. Methods and Results Serial mRS data from AFFINITY (Assessment of Fluoxetine in Stroke Recovery), a double-blind placebo randomized clinical trial of fluoxetine following stroke (n=1280) were analyzed to identify demographic and clinical associations with functional recovery (reduction in mRS) over 12 months. Associations were identified using single-measure (day 365) and repeated-measures (days 28, 90, 180, and 365) partial proportional odds logistic regression. Ninety-five percent of participants experienced a reduction in mRS after 12 months. Functional recovery was associated with age at stroke <70 years; no prestroke history of diabetes, coronary heart disease, or ischemic stroke; prestroke history of depression, a relationship partner, living with others, independence, or paid employment; no fluoxetine intervention; ischemic stroke (compared with hemorrhagic); stroke treatment in Vietnam (compared with Australia or New Zealand); longer time since current stroke; and lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale & Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores. Direction of associations was largely concordant between single-measure and repeated-measures models. Association strength and variance was generally smaller in the repeated-measures model compared with the single-measure model. Conclusions Repeated-measures may improve trial precision in identifying trial associations and effects. Further repeated-measures stroke analyses are required to prove methodological value. Registration URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au; Unique identifier: ACTRN12611000774921.

Keywords: cerebrovascular disease; functional outcomes; modified Rankin Scale; partial proportional odds; repeated measures; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of mRS scores at days 1, 28, 90, 180, and 365 (n=1276).
Visualization of the distribution of mRS scores by category at different follow‐up points during the AFFINITY trial. AFFINITY indicates Assessment of Fluoxetine in Stroke Recovery; and mRS, modified Rankin Scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Broderick JP, Adeoye O, Elm J. Evolution of the modified rankin scale and its use in future stroke trials. Stroke. 2017;48:2007–2012. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017866 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials ‐ a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38:1091–1096. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nunn A, Bath PM, Gray LJ. Analysis of the modified Rankin scale in randomised controlled trials of acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review. Stroke Res Treat. 2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/9482876 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rebchuk AD, O’Neill ZR, Szefer EK, Hill MD, Field TS. Health utility weighting of the modified rankin scale: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:203767. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3767 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ganesh A, Luengo‐Fernandez R, Wharton RM, Rothwell PM. Ordinal vs dichotomous analyses of modified rankin scale, 5‐year outcome, and cost of stroke. Neurology. 2018;91:1951–1960. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006554 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types