Postoperative morphologic changes of the isthmocele and clinical impact in patients treated by channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic technique
- PMID: 35929843
- PMCID: PMC10086996
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14387
Postoperative morphologic changes of the isthmocele and clinical impact in patients treated by channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic technique
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the changes in (1) residual myometrial thickness (RMT), (2) cesarean scar defect (CSD) size, and (3) clinical symptoms, before and after channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic resection for the treatment of CSD.
Methods: A single-center, observational, prospective, cohort study was carried out enrolling all symptomatic patients of childbearing age, diagnosed with CSD and routinely scheduled for channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic resection from July 2020 to July 2021 at the Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna. University of Bologna, Italy. The primary outcome was the difference in mean RMT before and after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were the differences before and 4 months after the surgery in: (1) CSD size measured by transvaginal ultrasound, (2) visual analog scale (VAS) scores for the symptoms, and (3) abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) rate. Lastly, patients' satisfaction was assessed by the global impression of improvement (PGI-I) score.
Results: We found a significant difference before and after the procedure in: (1) mean RMT (+2.0 mm; P < 0.001); mean size of the CSD (base: +1.6 mm; height: -2.5 mm; transverse diameter: -3.2 mm; volume: -263.7 mm3 ; P < 0.001); (2) mean VAS score for dyspareunia (-5.84; P < 0.001), dysmenorrhea (-8.94; P < 0.001), pelvic pain (-2.94; P < 0.001); (3) AUB rate (91% vs. 3%; P < 0.001). Lastly, the mean PGI-I score ± SD was 1.7 ± 0.9.
Conclusion: Channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic resection for the treatment of patients with symptomatic CSD may lead to an increase in RMT, decrease in CSD, and improvement of symptoms after the procedure, with high patient satisfaction.
Keywords: bleeding; cesarean section; cesarean section scar; defect; hysteroscopy; isthmocele; metroplasty; niche; pain; treatment; uterus.
© 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Clinical Success Rate of Extensive Hysteroscopic Cesarean Scar Defect Excision and Correlation to Histologic Findings.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 8. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 30858053
-
Channel-like 360° Isthmocele Treatment with a 16F Mini-Resectoscope: A Step-by-step Technique.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7):1229-1230. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 May 3. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31059782
-
Hysteroscopic removal, with or without laparoscopic assistance, of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy.Fertil Steril. 2022 Mar;117(3):643-645. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.027. Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 35219475
-
Optimal Isthmocele Management: Hysteroscopic, Laparoscopic, or Combination.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):565-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Nov 2. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33152531
-
Current surgical treatment of uterine isthmocele: an update of existing literature.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;311(1):13-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07880-w. Epub 2024 Dec 16. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39680143 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of clinical effectiveness and subsequent fertility between hysteroscopic resection and vaginal repair in patients with cesarean scar defect: a prospective observational study.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023 Dec 11;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01169-4. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023. PMID: 38082355 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence, definition, and etiology of cesarean scar defect and treatment of cesarean scar disorder: A narrative review.Reprod Med Biol. 2023 Aug 9;22(1):e12532. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12532. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2023. PMID: 37577060 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cervical Stenosis After Hysteroscopic Surgery for Cesarean Scar Disorder.Cureus. 2024 Mar 25;16(3):e56922. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56922. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38665709 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of long-term clinical effect and re-pregnant outcomes between hysteroscopic resection and laparoscopic defect repair in patients with non-severe cesarean scar defect: a retrospective study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 14;25(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07667-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40369449 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging manifestations of cesarean scar defect in reproductive‐aged women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(6):893‐902. - PubMed
-
- Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E. Resectoscopic correction of the "isthmocele" in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(2):172‐175. - PubMed
-
- Morris H. Surgical pathology of the lower uterine segment caesarean section scar: is the scar a source of clinical symptoms? Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1995;14(1):16‐20. - PubMed
-
- Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(1):85‐89. - PubMed
-
- Dosedla E, Gál P, Calda P. Association between deficient cesarean delivery scar and cesarean scar syndrome. J Clin Ultrasound. 2020;48(9):538‐543. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical