Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 5;22(1):672.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07663-1.

SARS-CoV-2 viral load is associated with risk of transmission to household and community contacts

Affiliations

SARS-CoV-2 viral load is associated with risk of transmission to household and community contacts

Darlene Bhavnani et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Factors that lead to successful SARS-CoV-2 transmission are still not well described. We investigated the association between a case's viral load and the risk of transmission to contacts in the context of other exposure-related factors.

Methods: Data were generated through routine testing and contact tracing at a large university. Case viral loads were obtained from cycle threshold values associated with a positive polymerase chain reaction test result from October 1, 2020 to April 15, 2021. Cases were included if they had at least one contact who tested 3-14 days after the exposure. Case-contact pairs were formed by linking index cases with contacts. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate differences in proportions of contacts testing positive. Generalized estimating equation models with a log link were used to evaluate whether viral load and other exposure-related factors were associated with a contact testing positive.

Results: Median viral load among the 212 cases included in the study was 5.6 (1.8-10.4) log10 RNA copies per mL of saliva. Among 365 contacts, 70 (19%) tested positive following their exposure; 36 (51%) were exposed to a case that was asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic on the day of exposure. The proportion of contacts that tested positive increased monotonically with index case viral load (12%, 23% and 25% corresponding to < 5, 5-8 and > 8 log10 copies per mL, respectively; X2 = 7.18, df = 2, p = 0.03). Adjusting for cough, time between test and exposure, and physical contact, the risk of transmission to a close contact was significantly associated with viral load (RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.22-1.32).

Conclusions: Further research is needed to understand whether these relationships persist for newer variants. For those variants whose transmission advantage is mediated through a high viral load, public health measures could be scaled accordingly. Index cases with higher viral loads could be prioritized for contact tracing and recommendations to quarantine contacts could be made according to the likelihood of transmission based on risk factors such as viral load.

Keywords: COVID-19; Contact; Exposure; Tracing; Transmission; Viral load.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlation between N-gene cycle threshold (Ct) values and ORF1ab gene Ct values among index cases (top). Correlation between S-gene cycle threshold (Ct) values and ORF1ab gene Ct values among index cases (middle). Percent of index cases by SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva, estimated using ORF1ab Ct values (bottom)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The number of index cases detected between October 1, 2020 and April 15, 2021 at UT Austin by the number of close contacts that tested (top) and number of test-positive contacts (bottom)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proportion of test positive contacts and 95% confidence intervals by presentation of cough among index cases on the day of exposure (top) and viral load at the time of test (bottom)

References

    1. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed 11 Nov 2021.
    1. Zahran HS, et al. Vital signs: asthma in children—United States, 2001–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(5):149–155. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6705e1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koh WC, et al. What do we know about SARS-CoV-2 transmission? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the secondary attack rate and associated risk factors. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0240205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marks M, et al. Transmission of COVID-19 in 282 clusters in Catalonia, Spain: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(5):629–636. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30985-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luo L, et al. Contact settings and risk for transmission in 3410 close contacts of patients with COVID-19 in Guangzhou, China: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(11):879–887. doi: 10.7326/M20-2671. - DOI - PMC - PubMed