Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):3810-3819.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.16473. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

Incidence and characteristics of hospital-acquired mucous membrane pressure injury: A five-year analysis

Affiliations

Incidence and characteristics of hospital-acquired mucous membrane pressure injury: A five-year analysis

Paul Fulbrook et al. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Pressure injuries on mucous membranes are caused by pressure from medical devices at the site of injury and differ to those on the skin. Intensive care patients, who have multiple devices in situ, are particularly vulnerable. There is a significant knowledge gap regarding mucous membrane pressure injury (MMPI) incidence in acute hospital settings.

Aim: To analyse MMPI incidence and characteristics in a tertiary acute general hospital.

Methods: A secondary data analysis of hospital clinical incident reports was conducted. The sample included all adults with MMPIs between 2015 and 2019. The STROBE reporting guideline was followed.

Results: There were 414 reports of MMPI. Most (91.5%, n = 379) were hospital-acquired with the majority found in intensive care patients (74.4%, n = 282). Hospital-acquired MMPI incidence was 0.1% (11 MMPI per 10,000 hospital episodes). In intensive care, the incidence was 2.4% (235 MMPI per 10,000 intensive care episodes). The median time from device insertion until reporting of an MMPI was 3 days. The most common sites of mucosal injury were the lips (35.6%) and mouth (28.8%). In all cases except one, MMPI was associated with medical device use at the site of injury. Five device types were identified (oral endotracheal tube-related 70.3%; urinary catheter 15.5%; gastric tube 8.3%; nasal prongs 3.5%; tracheostomy tube 2.4%). In intensive care, oral endotracheal tube-related devices were most often associated with MMPI (84.8%), whereas in non-intensive care MMPI it was the urinary catheter (51.4%).

Conclusions: While hospital-acquired MMPI incidence is relatively low, it is considerably higher in intensive care patients compared to those in non-intensive care settings. The most common sites are the lips and mouth.

Relevance to clinical practice: Mucous membrane pressure injuries represent a significant proportion of all hospital-acquired pressure injuries.

Patient or public contribution: Neither patients nor the public were directly involved in this project.

Keywords: critical care; hospitals; incidence; mucous membrane; patients; pressure injury; pressure ulcer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Alves, P., Eberhardt, T., Soares, R., Pinto, M., Pinto, C., Vales, L., Morais, J., & Oliveira, I. (2017). Differential diagnosis in pressure ulcers and medical devices. Česká a Slovenska Neurologie Neurochirie a Neurochirurgie, 80/113(Supp 1), S29-S35. https://doi.org/10.14735/amcsnn2017S29
    1. Arnold-Long, M., Ayer, M., & Borchert, K. (2017). Medical device-related pressure injuries in long-term acute care hospital setting. Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 44(4), 325-330. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000347
    1. Barakat-Johnson, M., Barnett, C., Wand, T., & White, K. (2017). Medical device-related pressure injuries: An exploratory descriptive study in an acute tertiary hospital in Australia. Journal of Tissue Viability, 26(4), 246-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2017.09.008
    1. Barakat-Johnson, M., Lai, M., Barnett, C., Wand, T., Wolak, D. L., Chan, C., Leong, T., & White, K. (2018). Hospital-acquired pressure injuries: Are they accurately reported? A prospective descriptive study in a large tertiary hospital in Australia. Journal of Tissue Viability, 27(4), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2018.07.003
    1. Barakat-Johnson, M., Lai, M., Wand, T., Li, M., White, K., & Coyer, F. (2019). The incidence and prevalence of medical device-related pressure ulcers in intensive care: A systematic review. Journal of Wound Care, 28(8), 512-521. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.8.512

LinkOut - more resources