Incidence and characteristics of hospital-acquired mucous membrane pressure injury: A five-year analysis
- PMID: 35932156
- DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16473
Incidence and characteristics of hospital-acquired mucous membrane pressure injury: A five-year analysis
Abstract
Background: Pressure injuries on mucous membranes are caused by pressure from medical devices at the site of injury and differ to those on the skin. Intensive care patients, who have multiple devices in situ, are particularly vulnerable. There is a significant knowledge gap regarding mucous membrane pressure injury (MMPI) incidence in acute hospital settings.
Aim: To analyse MMPI incidence and characteristics in a tertiary acute general hospital.
Methods: A secondary data analysis of hospital clinical incident reports was conducted. The sample included all adults with MMPIs between 2015 and 2019. The STROBE reporting guideline was followed.
Results: There were 414 reports of MMPI. Most (91.5%, n = 379) were hospital-acquired with the majority found in intensive care patients (74.4%, n = 282). Hospital-acquired MMPI incidence was 0.1% (11 MMPI per 10,000 hospital episodes). In intensive care, the incidence was 2.4% (235 MMPI per 10,000 intensive care episodes). The median time from device insertion until reporting of an MMPI was 3 days. The most common sites of mucosal injury were the lips (35.6%) and mouth (28.8%). In all cases except one, MMPI was associated with medical device use at the site of injury. Five device types were identified (oral endotracheal tube-related 70.3%; urinary catheter 15.5%; gastric tube 8.3%; nasal prongs 3.5%; tracheostomy tube 2.4%). In intensive care, oral endotracheal tube-related devices were most often associated with MMPI (84.8%), whereas in non-intensive care MMPI it was the urinary catheter (51.4%).
Conclusions: While hospital-acquired MMPI incidence is relatively low, it is considerably higher in intensive care patients compared to those in non-intensive care settings. The most common sites are the lips and mouth.
Relevance to clinical practice: Mucous membrane pressure injuries represent a significant proportion of all hospital-acquired pressure injuries.
Patient or public contribution: Neither patients nor the public were directly involved in this project.
Keywords: critical care; hospitals; incidence; mucous membrane; patients; pressure injury; pressure ulcer.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Incidence and characteristics of device-related pressure injuries in intensive care: A four-year analysis.Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Apr;87:103955. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103955. Epub 2025 Feb 3. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025. PMID: 39904075
-
Systematic review: Incidence and prevalence of mucous membrane pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings.Int Wound J. 2022 Feb;19(2):278-293. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13629. Epub 2021 Jun 14. Int Wound J. 2022. PMID: 34128339 Free PMC article.
-
State-wide prevalence of pressure injury in intensive care versus acute general patients: A five-year analysis.J Clin Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(15-16):4947-4961. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16687. Epub 2023 Mar 17. J Clin Nurs. 2023. PMID: 36932419
-
Exploring medical device-related pressure injuries in a single intensive care setting: A longitudinal point prevalence study.Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Feb;68:103155. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103155. Epub 2021 Nov 1. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022. PMID: 34736833
-
Prevention of Endotracheal Tube-Related Pressure Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Crit Care. 2022 Sep 1;31(5):416-424. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022644. Am J Crit Care. 2022. PMID: 36045034
Cited by
-
Risk factors for medical device-related pressure injury in ICU patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287326. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37352180 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of oral mucosal pressure injuries in children with orotracheal intubation in intensive care units: An observational study.Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13174. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13174. Epub 2024 Sep 30. Nurs Crit Care. 2025. PMID: 39349370 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of, and factors associated with, oral mucous membrane medical device-related pressure injury in critically ill patients with orotracheal intubation: a prospective cohort study.BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e098114. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098114. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40527564 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Alves, P., Eberhardt, T., Soares, R., Pinto, M., Pinto, C., Vales, L., Morais, J., & Oliveira, I. (2017). Differential diagnosis in pressure ulcers and medical devices. Česká a Slovenska Neurologie Neurochirie a Neurochirurgie, 80/113(Supp 1), S29-S35. https://doi.org/10.14735/amcsnn2017S29
-
- Arnold-Long, M., Ayer, M., & Borchert, K. (2017). Medical device-related pressure injuries in long-term acute care hospital setting. Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 44(4), 325-330. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000347
-
- Barakat-Johnson, M., Barnett, C., Wand, T., & White, K. (2017). Medical device-related pressure injuries: An exploratory descriptive study in an acute tertiary hospital in Australia. Journal of Tissue Viability, 26(4), 246-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2017.09.008
-
- Barakat-Johnson, M., Lai, M., Barnett, C., Wand, T., Wolak, D. L., Chan, C., Leong, T., & White, K. (2018). Hospital-acquired pressure injuries: Are they accurately reported? A prospective descriptive study in a large tertiary hospital in Australia. Journal of Tissue Viability, 27(4), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2018.07.003
-
- Barakat-Johnson, M., Lai, M., Wand, T., Li, M., White, K., & Coyer, F. (2019). The incidence and prevalence of medical device-related pressure ulcers in intensive care: A systematic review. Journal of Wound Care, 28(8), 512-521. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.8.512
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous