Implications of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System for Urology Practices
- PMID: 35932872
- PMCID: PMC9669102
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.05.052
Implications of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System for Urology Practices
Abstract
Objective: To determine the implications of the merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) for urology practices. MIPS is a Medicare payment model that determines whether a physician is financially penalized or receives bonus payment based on performance in four categories: quality, practice improvement, promotion of interoperability, and spending.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of urologist performance in MIPS for 2017 and 2019 using Medicare data. Urologist practice organization was categorized as single-specialty (small, medium, large) or multispecialty groups. MIPS scores were estimated by practice organization. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between urology practice characteristics, including proportion of dual eligible beneficiaries, and bonus payment adjustment as defined by Medicare methodology. Rates of consolidation (movement from smaller to larger practices) between 2017 and 2019 were compared between those who were and those who were not penalized in 2017.
Results: Urologists in small practices performed worse in MIPS and had a significantly lower adjusted odds ratio of receiving bonus payments in both 2017 and 2019 compared to larger group practices (odds ratio [OR] 0.04, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.03-0.05 in 2017 and OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.30-0.47 in 2019). Increasing percent of dual eligible beneficiaries within a patient panel was associated with decreased odds of receiving bonus payment in both performance years. Urologists penalized in 2017 had higher rates of consolidation by 2019 compared to those who were not (14% vs 5%, P <.05).
Conclusion: Small urology practices and those caring for a higher proportion of dual eligible beneficiaries tended to perform worse in MIPS.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
EDITORIAL COMMENT.Urology. 2022 Nov;169:90-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.05.053. Urology. 2022. PMID: 36371107 No abstract available.
References
-
- Anon: Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Overview - QPP. 2021. Available at: https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/overview, accessed November 15, 2021.
-
- Anon: Congress Should Replace Medicare’s Merit-Based Incentive Payment System | Health Affairs Blog. Available at: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20180222.35120/full/, accessed December 18, 2021. - DOI
-
- Khullar D, Burke GC and Casalino LP: Can Small Physician Practices Survive?: Sharing Services as a Path to Viability. JAMA 2018; 319: 1321–1322. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
