Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 6;22(1):1004.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08400-9.

Do health professionals' attitudes towards alcohol use matter for alcohol prevention efforts? Results from the WIRUS-OHS study

Tore Bonsaksen  1   2 , Mikkel Magnus Thørrisen  3   4 , Neda Hashemi  4 , David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras  5   6   7 , Randi Wågø Aas  8   9
Affiliations

Do health professionals' attitudes towards alcohol use matter for alcohol prevention efforts? Results from the WIRUS-OHS study

Tore Bonsaksen et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Use of alcohol is a major public health issue, representing the 7th largest burden of disease in the world. Workplaces offer a unique arena for health initiatives addressing alcohol use, where occupational health services (OHS) personnel play an important role. However, we do not know if the extent of such initiatives may be influenced by personal drinking attitudes among OHS personnel. Thus, the aim of the study was to explore how drinking attitudes among OHS personnel were associated with their frequency of working with alcohol-related cases and with their views on alcohol prevention activities in the OHS.

Methods: The WIRUS project included a cross-sectional survey of attitudes and practices among OHS personnel (n = 325) employed by Norwegian OHS services (n = 69), who informed about sociodemographic and professional characteristics, drinking attitudes, frequency of cases with alcohol-related issues, and perceptions toward the role of the OHS in primary, secondary, and tertiary alcohol prevention activities. Measures of associations were examined with linear and logistic regression models.

Results: Drinking attitudes were unrelated to the frequency of working with alcohol-related cases. Physicians, psychologists, and nurses had higher frequency of working with alcohol-related cases, compared to those with other professional backgrounds (β = 0.46, p = 0.01). Drinking attitudes were also unrelated to attitudes towards primary/secondary/tertiary alcohol prevention activities in the OHS, while female OHS personnel were more positive towards increased primary alcohol prevention activities in the OHS (OR: 1.82, p < 0.05). Only marginal portions (1%-3%) of the variance in attitudes towards alcohol prevention activities in the OHS were accounted for by the models.

Conclusion: This study did not find evidence of associations between OHS personnel's drinking attitudes and their practices and attitudes towards alcohol prevention activities. The lack of association between OHS personnel's attitudes towards alcohol use and their attitudes and practices relating to alcohol prevention in the workplace might point towards professionalism, as personal attitudes appear not to interfere with their priorities and professional mission. Given the small amount of outcome variance explained by the tested models, other variables should be used in future studies.

Keywords: Alcohol; Attitudes; Drinking; Norms; Occupational health services; Prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bonsaksen T, Skogstad L, Grimholt TK, Heir T, Ekeberg Ø, Lerdal A, Schou-Bredal I. Substance use in the Norwegian general population: Prevalence and associations with disease. J Subst Use. 2020;26(2):144–150. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2020.1784303. - DOI
    1. Skretting A, Bye EK, Vedøy TF, Lund KE. Substances in Norway 2016 [Rusmidler i Norge 2016]. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 2016. Accessed from https://www.fhi.no/publ/2017/rusmidler-i-norge-2016/
    1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, AlMazroa MA, Amann M, Anderson HR, Andrews KG. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Room R, Babor T, Rehm J. Alcohol and public health. Lancet. 2005;365(9458):519–530. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17870-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schou L, Moan IS. Alcohol use-sickness absence association and the moderating role of gender and socioeconomic status: a literature review. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2016;35(2):158–169. doi: 10.1111/dar.12278. - DOI - PubMed