Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 6;22(1):212.
doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03688-w.

Classifying knowledge used in complementary medicine consultations: a qualitative systematic review

Kate Davies  1 , Milena Heinsch  2   3 , Campbell Tickner  2 , Caragh Brosnan  2 , Amie Steel  4 , Gupteswar Patel  2 , Molly Marsh  2
Affiliations

Classifying knowledge used in complementary medicine consultations: a qualitative systematic review

Kate Davies et al. BMC Complement Med Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Complementary Medicine (CM) is widely used internationally but there is limited understanding of the forms of knowledge CM practitioners use in their clinical practice and how they use this knowledge in interactions with patients. This review aims to synthesise the existing evidence on the forms of knowledge that are mobilised, and the role of this knowledge in the interactions between practitioners and patients during CM consultations. It considered a diverse range of CM practice areas to develop a classification of CM practitioners' knowledge use in consultations.

Methods: Systematic searches of health and sociology databases were conducted using core concepts, including complementary and alternative medicine, practitioners, and knowledge. Articles were included where they reported on data from recorded CM practitioner and patient consultations and offered insights into the types and applications of knowledge used in these consultations. 16 unique studies were included in the review. Data were extracted, coded and analysed thematically.

Results: Results demonstrate that diverse sources of knowledge were mobilised by practitioners, predominantly derived from the patients themselves -their bodies and their narratives. This reflected principles of patient-centredness. The use of discipline specific forms of knowledge and references to biomedical sources illustrated ongoing efforts towards legitimacy for CM practice.

Conclusion: CM practitioners are navigating tensions between what some might see as competing, others as complementary, forms of knowledge. The classification system provides a useful tool for promoting critically reflective practice by CM practitioners, particularly in relation to self-assessment of knowledge translation and patient interactions.

Keywords: Complementary medicine; Knowledge; Patient consultation; Patient-centred; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adams J, Andrews G, Barnes J, Broom A, Magin P. Traditional, complementary and integrative medicine: an international reader. Macmillan International Higher Education; 2012.
    1. Steel A, McIntyre E, Harnett J, Foley H, Adams J, Sibbritt D, Wardle J, Frawley J. Complementary medicine use in the Australian population: results of a nationally-representative cross-sectional survey. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brosnan C. “Quackery” in the academy? Professional knowledge, autonomy and the debate over complementary medicine degrees. Sociol. 2015;49:1047–1064. doi: 10.1177/0038038514557912. - DOI
    1. Leach MJ, Canaway R, Hunter J. Evidence based practice in traditional & complementary medicine: an agenda for policy, practice, education and research. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;31:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.01.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Foley H, Steel A. The nexus between patient-centered care and complementary medicine: allies in the era of chronic disease? J Complement Altern Med. 2017;23:158–163. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0386. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types