Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;33(12):2537-2545.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06430-x. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

The association between lumbar paraspinal muscle functional cross-sectional area on MRI and regional volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography

Affiliations

The association between lumbar paraspinal muscle functional cross-sectional area on MRI and regional volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography

E Chiapparelli et al. Osteoporos Int. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Osteosarcopenia is a common condition among elderly and postmenopausal female patients. Site-specific bone mineral density is more predictive of bone-related complications. Few studies have investigated muscle-bone associations. Our results demonstrated that in women, significant positive associations between paraspinal muscles FCSA and vBMD exist at different lumbosacral levels. These regional differences should be considered when interpreting bone-muscle associations in the lumbar spine.

Introduction: There is increasing evidence between bone and muscle volume associations. Previous studies have demonstrated comorbidity between osteoporosis and sarcopenia. Recent studies showed that sarcopenic subjects had a fourfold higher risk of concomitant osteoporosis compared to non-sarcopenic individuals. Although site-specific bone mineral density (BMD) assessments were reported to be more predictive of bone-related complications after spinal fusions than BMD assessments in general, there are few studies that have investigated level-specific bone-muscle interactions. The aim of this study is to investigate the associations between muscle functional cross-sectional area (FCSA) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and site-specific quantitative computed tomography (QCT) volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) in the lumbosacral region among spine surgery patients.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a prospective institutional database of posterior lumbar fusion patients. Patients with available MRI undergoing posterior lumbar fusion were included. Muscle measurements and FCSA were conducted and calculated utilizing a manual segmentation and custom-written program at the superior endplate of the L3-L5 vertebrae level. vBMD measurements were performed and calculated utilizing a QCT pro software at L1-L2 levels and bilateral sacral ala. We stratified by sex for all analyses.

Results: A total of 105 patients (mean age 61.5 years and 52.4% females) were included. We found that female patients had statistically significant lower muscle FCSA than male patients. After adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI), there were statistically significant positive associations between L1-L2 and S1 vBMD with L3 psoas FCSA as well as sacral ala vBMD with L3 posterior paraspinal and L5 psoas FCSA. These associations were not found in males.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that in women, significant positive associations between the psoas and posterior paraspinal muscle FCSA and vBMD exist in different lumbosacral levels, which are independent of age and BMI. These regional differences should be considered when interpreting bone and muscle associations in the lumbar spine.

Keywords: Functional cross-sectional area; Lean muscle; MRI; Paraspinal muscle; Psoas muscle; Spine surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clynes MA, Gregson CL, Bruyère O et al (2021) Osteosarcopenia: where osteoporosis and sarcopenia collide. Rheumatology (Oxford) 60:529–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa755 - DOI
    1. Teng Z, Zhu Y, Teng Y, Long Q, Hao Q, Yu X, Yang L, Lv Y, Liu J, Zheng Y, Lu S (2021) The analysis of osteosarcopenia as a risk factor for fractures, mortality, and falls. Osteoporos Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05963-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huo YR, Suriyaarachchi P, Gomez F et al (2015) Phenotype of Osteosarcopenia in older individuals with a history of falling. J Am Med Dir Assoc 16:290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2014.10.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirk B, Zanker J, Duque G (2020) Osteosarcopenia: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment—facts and numbers. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 11:609–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12567 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ward RJ, Roberts CC, Bencardino JT et al (2017) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Osteoporosis and bone mineral density. J Am Coll Radiol 14:S189–S202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.018 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources