Vacuum curette lumbar discectomy mechanics for use in spine surgical training simulators
- PMID: 35933556
- PMCID: PMC9357010
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17512-5
Vacuum curette lumbar discectomy mechanics for use in spine surgical training simulators
Abstract
Simulation in surgical training is a growing field and this study aims to understand the force and torque experienced during lumbar spine surgery to design simulator haptic feedback. It was hypothesized that force and torque would differ among lumbar spine levels and the amount of tissue removed by ≥ 7%, which would be detectable to a user. Force and torque profiles were measured during vacuum curette insertion and torsion, respectively, in multiple spinal levels on two cadavers. Multiple tests per level were performed. Linear and torsional resistances of 2.1 ± 1.6 N/mm and 5.6 ± 4.3 N mm/°, respectively, were quantified. Statistically significant differences were found in linear and torsional resistances between all passes through disc tissue (both p = 0.001). Tool depth (p < 0.001) and lumbar level (p < 0.001) impacted torsional resistance while tool speed affected linear resistance (p = 0.022). Average differences in these statistically significant comparisons were ≥ 7% and therefore detectable to a surgeon. The aforementioned factors should be considered when developing haptic force and torque feedback, as they will add to the simulated lumbar discectomy realism. These data can additionally be used inform next generation tool design. Advances in training and tools may help improve future surgeon training.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures





Similar articles
-
An in vitro study examining a novel suction curette device for lumbar discectomy compared with standard manual discectomy.J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Apr;26(4):454-458. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16283. Epub 2017 Jan 27. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 28128701
-
Development and validation of an artificial wetlab training system for the lumbar discectomy.Eur Spine J. 2014 Sep;23(9):1978-83. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3257-3. Epub 2014 Mar 5. Eur Spine J. 2014. PMID: 24595488
-
Outcomes research and lumbar discectomy.Neurosurg Focus. 2002 Aug 15;13(2):E8. doi: 10.3171/foc.2002.13.2.9. Neurosurg Focus. 2002. PMID: 15916405 Review.
-
Analysis of Surgical Forces Required to Gain Access Using a Probe for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery via Cadaveric-Based Experiments Towards Use in Training Simulators.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 Jan;68(1):330-339. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2996980. Epub 2020 Dec 21. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021. PMID: 32746011
-
Evolution of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery.World Neurosurg. 2020 Aug;140:622-626. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.071. Epub 2020 May 17. World Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 32434014 Review.
Cited by
-
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of orthopedic, vascular surgery, and anesthesiology doctors regarding postoperative deep vein thrombosis prevention in surgical patients.Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 17;15(1):13317. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98441-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40247045 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ruikar D, Hegadi R, Santosh K. A systematic review on orthopedic simulators for psycho-motor skill and surgical procedure training. J. Med. Syst. 2018;42(168):1–21. - PubMed
-
- Go T, Bürki-Cohen J, Soja N. The effect of simulator motion on pilot training and evaluation. Model. Simul. Technol. Conf. 2000 doi: 10.2514/6.2000-4296. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical