Preferences for end-of-life care: A cross-sectional survey of Chinese frail nursing home residents
- PMID: 35933614
- DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16483
Preferences for end-of-life care: A cross-sectional survey of Chinese frail nursing home residents
Abstract
Aim and objectives: To assess (1) the experience, knowledge and preferences of end-of-life care among frail nursing home residents and (2) the preferences of residents' family caregivers.
Background: Globally, nursing homes are becoming an important place where many older people will receive their end-of-life care. Thus, assessing the end-of-life care preferences among nursing home residents is crucial.
Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Methods: Residents aged ≥65 years, with frail or pre-frail status (n = 286) in 34 nursing homes were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the outcomes and regression analyses were used to evaluate factors related to the outcomes. Kappa statistics were used to examine the agreement between the preferences among 21 residents and their family caregivers. The manuscript was guided by the STROBE checklist.
Results: 5.9% and 10.5% of the participants had heard of advance care planning and advance directive respectively. After explanations of the terms by the research team, 42.3% of the participants preferred advance care planning, whereas 22.0% preferred advance directive. The top reason for not preferring advance care planning/advance directive is perceiving them as 'not necessary'. Nursing homes were the most preferred place to receive end-of-life care (41.6%). Whereas hospitals were the most preferred place for death (36.0%). The agreement among resident and family caregiver dyads ranged from none to minimal in most outcomes.
Conclusions: This study revealed the lack of awareness around advance care planning and advance directive among frail nursing home residents. Future research should focus on developing effective educational interventions to enhance the residents' awareness of these topics.
Relevance to clinical practice: To increase awareness among nursing home residents, more educational programs should be implemented. Frail older residents might not see the relevance of advance care planning; interventions need to include both current and future care to increase its relevance.
Keywords: advance care planning; advance directive; cross-sectional survey; end-of-life care; family caregiver; frailty; nursing home.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Advance care planning preferences in Chinese nursing home residents: results from two cross-sectional studies in Hong Kong and Taiwan.BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Aug 3;20(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00820-4. BMC Palliat Care. 2021. PMID: 34344332 Free PMC article.
-
Preferences for end-of-life care: a study protocol for a cross-sectional survey of Chinese frail elderly home residents in Hong Kong.BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 31;10(3):e033862. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033862. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32234742 Free PMC article.
-
End-of-life care preferences of nursing home residents: Results of a cross-sectional study.Palliat Med. 2016 Oct;30(9):843-53. doi: 10.1177/0269216316634242. Epub 2016 Mar 9. Palliat Med. 2016. PMID: 26962065
-
The effects of advance care planning intervention on nursing home residents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Aug;132:104276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104276. Epub 2022 Apr 30. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022. PMID: 35667145
-
Turning It Over to God: African American Assisted Living Residents' End-of-Life Preferences and Advance Care Planning.J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Oct 9;78(10):1747-1755. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad100. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023. PMID: 37466307 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Advance care planning readiness among community-dwelling older adults and the influencing factors: a scoping review.BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Nov 4;23(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01583-4. BMC Palliat Care. 2024. PMID: 39491026 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Bischoff, K. E., Sudore, R., Miao, Y., Boscardin, W. J., & Smith, A. K. (2013). Advance care planning and the quality of end-of-life care in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61(2), 209-214.
-
- Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, A., Rietjens, J. A., & Van der Heide, A. (2014). The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 28(8), 1000-1025.
-
- Carr, D., & Luth, E. A. (2017). Advance care planning: Contemporary issues and future directions. Innovation in Aging, 1(1), 1-10.
-
- Chan, C. W. H., Wong, M. M. H., Choi, K. C., Chan, H. Y. L., Chow, A. Y. M., Lo, R. S. K., & Sham, M. M. K. (2019). Prevalence, perception, and predictors of advance directives among Hong Kong Chinese: A population-based survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030365
-
- Chan, H. M., Doris, M. T., Wong, K. H., Lai, J. C.-L., & Chui, C. K. (2015). End-of-life decision making in Hong Kong: The appeal of the shared decision making model. In R. Fan (Eds.), Family-oriented informed consent (pp. 149-167). Springer.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources