Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;101(10):1153-1162.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14433. Epub 2022 Aug 7.

Comparison of primiparous women's childbirth experience in labor induction with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol - a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS)

Katariina Place  1 , Heidi Kruit  1 , Leena Rahkonen  1
Affiliations

Comparison of primiparous women's childbirth experience in labor induction with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol - a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS)

Katariina Place et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Primiparity and labor induction, especially when cervical ripening is required, are risk factors for a negative childbirth experience. Our aim was to compare childbirth experience in primiparous women with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol using the validated Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). We also wanted to compare assessment of a negative childbirth experience by visual analogue scale (VAS) and CEQ.

Material and methods: This is a prospective study of 362 primiparous women undergoing cervical ripening and labor induction by balloon catheter (67.4%) or oral misoprostol (32.6%) at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between January 1, 2019 and January 31, 2020. After delivery, the women assessed their childbirth experience using the CEQ, and patient records provided the patient characteristics, delivery outcomes and VAS ratings. We analyzed the results using IBM SPSS Statistics.

Results: Overall, the women experienced their labor and delivery rather positively, with a mean CEQ score of 2.9 (SD 0.6) (scale 1-4), and no differences were detectable when comparing women with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or misoprostol. However, women with balloon catheter were more often satisfied with the method chosen for them and would choose the same method in a future pregnancy. Compared with CEQ, VAS seems mainly to reflect the women's perception of their own capacity to give birth and the safety of the hospital setting, not the level of professional support or participation in decision-making. According to our results, CEQ and VAS are comparable, but the usability of the CEQ is limited by its inability to distinguish the most negative and the most positive experiences, and the VAS is limited by its simplicity.

Conclusions: Women with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol experienced their childbirth rather positively, results being similar in both groups. However, women with cervical ripening by balloon catheter were more content with their labor induction. The CEQ and VAS can both be used to assess the childbirth experience of primiparous women undergoing labor induction, but both methods have limitations.

Keywords: balloon catheter; childbirth experience; childbirth experience questionnaire; induction of labor; labor induction; misoprostol; visual analogue scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study population.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Heino A, Kiuru S, Gissler M. Perinatal Statistics – Parturients, Deliveries and Newborns 2020 (Preliminary Data). Finnish Institute for health and welfare; 2021.
    1. Adler K, Rahkonen L, Kruit H. Maternal childbirth experience in induced and spontaneous labour measured in a visual analog scale and the factors influencing it; a two‐year cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:415. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soriano‐Vidal FJ, Oliver‐Roig A, Cabrero‐García J, Congost‐Maestre N, Dencker A, Richart‐Martínez M. The Spanish version of the childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ‐E): reliability and validity assessment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:372. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joensuu J, Saarijärvi H, Rouhe H, et al. Maternal childbirth experience and time of delivery: a retrospective 7‐year cohort study of 105 847 parturients in Finland. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e046433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falk M, Nelson M, Blomberg M. The impact of obstetric interventions and complications on women's satisfaction with childbirth a population based cohort study including 16,000 women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:494. - PMC - PubMed