Radiation doses and fractionation schedules in non-low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast (BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01): a randomised, factorial, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study
- PMID: 35934006
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01246-6
Radiation doses and fractionation schedules in non-low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast (BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01): a randomised, factorial, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study
Abstract
Background: Whole breast irradiation (WBI) after conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) reduces local recurrence. We investigated whether a tumour bed boost after WBI improved outcomes, and examined radiation dose fractionation sensitivity for non-low-risk DCIS.
Methods: The study was an international, randomised, unmasked, phase 3 trial involving 136 participating centres of six clinical trials organisations in 11 countries (Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Canada, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Switzerland, Italy, Ireland, and the UK). Eligible patients were women aged 18 years or older with unilateral, histologically proven, non-low-risk DCIS treated by breast-conserving surgery with at least 1 mm of clear radial resection margins. They were assigned to one of four groups (1:1:1:1) of no tumour bed boost versus boost after conventional versus hypofractionated WBI, or randomly assigned to one of two groups (1:1) of no boost versus boost after each centre prespecified conventional or hypofractionated WBI. The conventional WBI used was 50 Gy in 25 fractions, and hypofractionated WBI was 42·5 Gy in 16 fractions. A boost dose of 16 Gy in eight fractions, if allocated, was delivered after WBI. Patients and clinicians were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was time to local recurrence. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00470236).
Findings: Between June 25, 2007, and June 30, 2014, 1608 patients were randomly assigned to have no boost (805 patients) or boost (803 patients). Conventional WBI was given to 831 patients, and hypofractionated WBI was given to 777 patients. Median follow-up was 6·6 years. The 5-year free-from-local-recurrence rates were 92·7% (95% CI 90·6-94·4%) in the no-boost group and 97·1% (95·6-98·1%) in the boost group (hazard ratio 0·47; 0·31-0·72; p<0·001). The boost group had higher rates of grade 2 or higher breast pain (10% [8-12%] vs 14% [12-17%], p=0·003) and induration (6% [5-8%] vs 14% [11-16%], p<0·001).
Interpretation: In patients with resected non-low-risk DCIS, a tumour bed boost after WBI reduced local recurrence with an increase in grade 2 or greater toxicity. The results provide the first randomised trial data to support the use of boost radiation after postoperative WBI in these patients to improve local control. The international scale of the study supports the generalisability of the results.
Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Susan G Komen for the Cure, Breast Cancer Now, OncoSuisse, Dutch Cancer Society, Canadian Cancer Trials Group.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests BHC reports research grants from National Health and Medical Research Council, Susan G Komen for the Cure, Breast Cancer Now, and OncoSuisse Swiss Federation Against Cancer to support the submitted work at Trans-Tasman Oncology Group (Newcastle, NSW, Australia), Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (Melbourne, VIC, Australia), and participating cooperative trials groups and sites; and in kind support from Veracyte and NanoString for biomarker testing, outside the submitted work. IHK and AHW report research grants to support the submitted work at the UK Trial Centre, University of Edinburgh (Breast Cancer Now); and research funding from the Dutch Cancer Society to support the submitted work in the Netherlands. TJW reports research funding and non-direct financial support for biomarker testing from Exact Sciences and Genomic Health for ongoing studies. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Breast radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: could less be more?Lancet. 2022 Aug 6;400(10350):408-410. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01381-2. Lancet. 2022. PMID: 35933995 No abstract available.
-
[Boost and hypofractionation in DCIS].Strahlenther Onkol. 2022 Dec;198(12):1122-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-02016-y. Epub 2022 Oct 20. Strahlenther Onkol. 2022. PMID: 36264356 Free PMC article. German. No abstract available.
-
Breast radiotherapy for non-low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: to boost or not to boost?Lancet. 2023 Jan 7;401(10370):23-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02399-6. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 36610767 No abstract available.
-
DCIS Update: Escalation or De-escalation? Boost, Fractionation, and Omission of Radiation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Mar 15;115(4):813-816. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.010. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023. PMID: 36822780 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Quality of life after breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant radiotherapy for non-low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01): 2-year results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):685-698. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30085-1. Epub 2020 Mar 20. Lancet Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32203696 Clinical Trial.
-
Late side-effects and cosmetic results of accelerated partial breast irradiation with interstitial brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk invasive and in-situ carcinoma of the female breast: 5-year results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):259-268. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30011-6. Epub 2017 Jan 14. Lancet Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28094198 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated whole breast irradiation for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after breast conservation: a propensity score-matched analysis from a national multicenter cohort (COBCG-02 study).J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul;147(7):2069-2077. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03483-5. Epub 2021 Jan 2. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33387035 Free PMC article.
-
Individualised target volume selection and dose prescription after conservative surgery, mastectomy and reconstruction.Breast. 2019 Nov;48 Suppl 1:S69-S75. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(19)31128-2. Breast. 2019. PMID: 31839165 Review.
-
Risk factors and state-of-the-art indications for boost irradiation in invasive breast carcinoma.Brachytherapy. 2017 May-Jun;16(3):552-564. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 1. Brachytherapy. 2017. PMID: 28377213 Review.
Cited by
-
Identifying recurrences and metastasis after ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.Histopathology. 2023 Jan;82(1):106-118. doi: 10.1111/his.14804. Histopathology. 2023. PMID: 36482277 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Breast carcinoma arising in a fibroadenoma: A case series of 16 patients and review of the literature.Oncol Lett. 2023 Dec 1;27(1):39. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.14172. eCollection 2024 Jan. Oncol Lett. 2023. PMID: 38116580 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline.Curr Oncol. 2024 Dec 3;31(12):7738-7753. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31120569. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39727692 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of resection margin width on local recurrence following breast-conserving surgery and whole breast radiotherapy for pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Oncol. 2025 Mar 6;4(1):e000633. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000633. eCollection 2025. BMJ Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40099004 Free PMC article.
-
Radiotherapy statements of the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference-a German expert perspective.Strahlenther Onkol. 2024 Jun;200(6):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02209-7. Epub 2024 Feb 23. Strahlenther Onkol. 2024. PMID: 38393398 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical