Organ donation by Maastricht-III pediatric patients: Recommendations of the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) and Association des Anesthésistes Réanimateurs Pédiatriques d'Expression Française (ADARPEF) Part I: Ethical considerations and family care

Abstract

The French Transplant Health Authority (Agence de la Biomédecine) has broadened its organ- and tissue-donation criteria to include pediatric patients whose death is defined by circulatory criteria and after the planned withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WLST) (Maastricht category III). A panel of pediatric experts convened to translate data in the international literature into recommendations for organ and tissue donation in this patient subgroup. The panel estimated that, among children aged 5 years or over with severe irreversible neurological injury (due to primary neurological injury or post-anoxic brain injury) and no progression to brain death, the number of potential donors, although small, deserves attention. The experts emphasized the importance of adhering strictly to the collegial procedure for deciding to withdraw life support. Once this decision is made, the available data should be used to evaluate whether the patient might be a potential donor, before suggesting organ donation to the parents. This suggestion should be reserved for parents who have unequivocally manifested their acceptance of WLST. The discussion with the parents should include both the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) team under the responsibility of a senior physician and the hospital organ- and tissue-procurement team. All recommendations about family care during the end of life of a child in the PICU must be followed. The course and potential challenges of organ donation in Maastricht-III pediatric patients must be anticipated. The panel of experts recommended strict compliance with French recommendations (by the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques) about WLST and providing deep and continuous sedation until circulatory arrest. The experts identified the PICU as the best place to implement life-support discontinuation and emphasized the importance of returning the body to the PICU after organ donation. French law prohibits the transfer of these patients from one hospital to another. A description of the expert-panel recommendations regarding the organization and techniques appropriate for children who die after controlled circulatory arrest (Maastricht III) is published simultaneously in the current issue of this journal..

Keywords: Children; Circulatory arrest; Infants; Organ donation; Sedation; Support; Withdrawal of life-sustaininig therapies.