Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022;26(8):778-785.
doi: 10.1007/s12603-022-1825-5.

Efficacy of Antiresorptive Treatment in Osteoporotic Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

B A Cedeno-Veloz  1 , J Erviti Lopez, M Gutiérrez-Valencia, L Leache Alegría, L C Saiz, A M Rodríguez García, M Sánchez Latorre, R Ramírez Vélez, M Izquierdo, N Martínez-Velilla
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of Antiresorptive Treatment in Osteoporotic Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

B A Cedeno-Veloz et al. J Nutr Health Aging. 2022.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate concerns surrounding the benefits of antiresorptive drugs in older adults, a systematic review was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of these treatments in the prevention of osteoporotic hip fractures in older adults.

Design: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Setting and participants: older adults ≥65 years with osteoporosis, with or without a previous fragility fracture. Studies with cancer-related and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, participants <65 years and no reported hip fracture were not included.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched. The primary outcome was hip fracture, and subgroup analysis (≥75 years, with different drug types and secondary prevention) and sensitivity analysis was carried out using a GRADE evaluation. Secondary outcomes were any type of fractures, vertebral fracture, bone markers and adverse events. The risk of bias was assessment with the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Results: A total of 12 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) qualified for this meta-analysis, with 36,196 participants. Antiresorptive drugs have a statistically significant effect on the prevention of hip fracture (RR=0.70; 95%CI 0.60 to 0.81), but with a moderate GRADE quality of evidence and a high number needed to treat (NNT) of 186. For other outcomes, there is a statistically significant effect, but with a low to moderate quality of evidence. Antiresorptives showed no reduction in the risk of hip fracture in people ≥75 years. The results for different drug types, secondary prevention and sensitivity analysis are similar to the main analyses and have the same concerns.

Conclusions: Antiresorptive drugs have a statistically significant effect on preventing hip fracture but with a moderate quality (unclear/high risk of bias) and high NNT (186). This small benefit disappears in those ≥75 years, but increases in secondary prevention. More RCTs in very old osteoporotic adults are needed.

Keywords: Age-related changes; bone; drug-related; hip fracture; osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart of search results and included studies
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graph showing the risk of bias
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot for primary analysis of hip fracture in older adults
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sànchez-Riera L, Wilson N. Fragility fractures & their impact on older people. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2017;31(2):169–191. 10.1016/j.berh.2017.10.001 PubMed PMID: 29224695. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Järvinen TLN, Michaëlsson K, Jokihaara J, et al. Overdiagnosis of bone fragility in the quest to prevent hip fracture. BMJ. 2015;350 10.1136/bmj.h2088 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Erviti J, Gorricho J, Saiz LC, Perry T, Wright JM. Rethinking the appraisal and approval of drugs for fracture prevention. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8 10.3389/fphar.2017.00265 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jeong C, Ha J. The effect of denosumab on bone mass in super elderly patients. J Bone Metab. 2020;27(2):119. 10.11005/jbm.2020.27.2.119 PubMed PMID: 32572372, PMCID 7297623. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alejandro P, Constantinescu F. A review of osteoporosis in the older adult. Clin Geriatr Med. 2017;33(1):27–40. 10.1016/j.cger.2016.08.003 PubMed PMID: 27886696. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances