Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 22:13:910077.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.910077. eCollection 2022.

The Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitors on the Development of Gastric Neoplastic Lesions in Patients With Autoimmune Atrophic Gastritis

Affiliations

The Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitors on the Development of Gastric Neoplastic Lesions in Patients With Autoimmune Atrophic Gastritis

Emanuele Dilaghi et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been widely prescribed as a primary treatment for acid-related disorders. A large body of literature reported several adverse outcomes due to PPI therapy, including an increased risk of gastric cancer (GC). Autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting the oxyntic mucosa, leading to mucosal atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and reduced gastric acid secretion, up to the possible development of dysplasia and intestinal-type GC. Whether PPI use may increase the GC risk in AAG patients has not yet been investigated. We conducted a case-control study in AAG patients to assess the association between the PPI use before AAG diagnosis and the development of GC at follow-up (FU).

Materials and methods: Patients were included from a prospective cohort of AAG patients (diagnosed 1992-2021) in a referral center for gastric autoimmunity; all patients adhered to an endoscopic-histological FU program according to Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS) I/II (management of epithelial precancerous conditions) guidelines. At diagnosis, clinical/biochemical data and PPI use before AAG diagnosis (withdrawn at the time of diagnosis), for at least 12 months, were evaluated. Patients who developed gastric neoplastic lesions (GNLs) at FU were considered as cases; patients without a diagnosis of GNLs at FU were considered as controls. At a total FU of 2.3 years (1-13), 35 cases were identified, and controls were matched 2:1 by age ( ± 3 years), gender, and years of FU (n=70); therefore, a total of n=105 patients were included in the study.

Results: The proportion of PPI users before AAG diagnosis was significantly higher in cases than in controls (54.3% vs. 18.6%, p<0.001). At logistic regression, considering as a dependent variable the development of GNLs at FU, a positive association was shown for PPI use before AAG diagnosis (OR 9.6, 95%CI 2.3-40.3), while other independent variables as the use of antiplatelets/anticoagulants (OR 2.8, 95%CI 0.7-12.0), age ≥ 50 years (OR 2.0, 95%CI 0.2-18.1), 1st-degree family history for GC (OR 2.4, 95%CI 0.4-15.2), and smoking habit (OR 0.4, 95%CI 0.1-2.1) were not associated.

Conclusions: PPI use before the diagnosis of AAG appears to considerably increase the risk of subsequent GNL development. Considering the common misuse of PPIs, physicians should regularly reevaluate the appropriateness of ongoing PPI therapy, in particular in patients with a clinical suspicion of or already diagnosed AAG.

Keywords: autoimmune atrophic gastritis; gastric autoimmunity; gastric cancer; gastric neoplastic lesion; proton pump inhibitor (PPI).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study population of patients with autoimmune atrophic gastritis included in the case–control study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of the use of antiplatelets/anticoagulants in patients with and without the development of gastric neoplastic lesions. *The use of antiplatelets/anticoagulants was significantly more frequent in cases than in controls (40.0% vs. 15.7%, p=0.008).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schnoll-Sussman F, Niec R, Katz PO. Proton Pump Inhibitors: The Good, Bad, and Ugly. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am (2020) 30(2):239–51. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2019.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strand DS, Kim D, Peura DA. 25 Years of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Comprehensive Review. Gut Liver (2017) 11(1):27–37. doi: 10.5009/gnl15502 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salvo EM, Ferko NC, Cash SB, Gonzalez A, Kahrilas PJ. Umbrella Review of 42 Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses: The Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2021) 54(2):129–43. doi: 10.1111/apt.16407 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abrahami D, McDonald EG, Schnitzer ME, Barkun AN, Suissa S, Azoulay L. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Risk of Gastric Cancer: Population-Based Cohort Study. Gut (2022) 71(1):16–24. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325097 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seo SI, Park CH, You SC, Kim JY, Lee KJ, Kim J, et al. . Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study Using Two Different Types of Nationwide Databases in Korea. Gut (2021) 70(11):2066–75. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323845 - DOI - PubMed

Substances