Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 4;14(7):e26543.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.26543. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Comparison of Anterior vs. Dorsal Approach for Spinal Accessory to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer in Patients With a Brachial Plexus Injury and Its Outcome on Shoulder Function

Affiliations

Comparison of Anterior vs. Dorsal Approach for Spinal Accessory to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer in Patients With a Brachial Plexus Injury and Its Outcome on Shoulder Function

Hasan Tahir et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Brachial plexus injuries are frequently encountered in the domain of plastic surgery, mostly secondary to road traffic accidents, gunshot injuries, or falls from a height. Many modalities have been described in the management, depending on the level and duration of the injury. C5, C6 and C5, C6, C7 are two common patterns in which nerve repair and transfers are described. At our center, we practice spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer in all patients with upper trunk brachial plexus injury. There are two described approaches for the spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer, i.e. anterior or dorsal. The rationale for doing the posterior approach is that this approach avoids damaging the suprascapular nerve at its entrance in the suprascapular notch under the suprascapular ligament during exploration due to traction. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study with a consecutive sampling of 23 patients presenting at Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, with upper trunk brachial plexus injuries during the time period from January 2016 to December 2017, i.e. two years. We divided these 23 patients into two groups, one with the anterior approach and the other with a dorsal approach for spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for shoulder abduction. The mean duration of post-surgical follow-up was from 18 to 24 months and recovery and functional outcomes were assessed. Results Out of the 23 patients that were included, 10 patients were operated on with an anterior approach and 13 with a posterior approach. Fifty percent (50%) of patients operated with the anterior approach and 84% of patients with the posterior showed the best motor grade recovery of M4, respectively, with better performance in patients with the posterior approach as compared to the anterior approach. Conclusion We advocate taking a posterior approach for spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for shoulder abduction, as it has shown better results with reliable outcomes concerning shoulder abduction, angle of abduction, and range of motion.

Keywords: anterior approach; bilateral brachial plexus injury; dorsal approach; nerve transfer; shoulder function; spinal accessory nerve; suprascapular nerve.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Surgical marking on the patient undergoing nerve transfer via the posterior approach
Figure 2
Figure 2. Intraoperative view of spinal accessory nerve and suprascapular nerve being identified and isolated
Figure 3
Figure 3. Demonstrates the MRC grades achieved by patients in respective groups
MRC: medical research council
Figure 4
Figure 4. Demonstrates the improvement in MRC grades over the 03, 06, 12, 18, and 24 months follow-up for shoulder abduction in each group
MRC: medical research council
Figure 5
Figure 5. Intraoperative view of coaptation of the two nerves via the posterior approach

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Functional outcome predictors after spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer for restoration of shoulder abduction in traumatic brachial plexus injuries in adults: the effect of time from injury to surgery. Solla DJ, de Oliveira AJ, Riechelmann RS, Martins RS, Siqueira MG. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00068-020-01501-2. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48:1217–1223. - PubMed
    1. Outcomes of spinal accessory-to-suprascapular nerve transfers for brachial plexus birth injury. Segal D, Cornwall R, Little KJ. J Hand Surg Am. 2019;44:578–587. - PubMed
    1. The epidemiology of adult traumatic brachial plexus lesions in a large metropolis. Faglioni W Jr, Siqueira MG, Martins RS, Heise CO, Foroni L. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-013-1948-x. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:1025–1028. - PubMed
    1. Timing of surgery in traumatic brachial plexus injury: a systematic review. Martin E, Senders JT, DiRisio AC, Smith TR, Broekman ML. J Neurosurg. 2018;130:1–13. - PubMed
    1. Monitoring to prevent brachial plexus injury. Thatte MR. https://jpgmonline.com/article.asp?issn=0022-3859;year=2014;volume=60;is.... J Postgrad Med. 2014;60:241–242. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources