Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 5;14(7):e26567.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.26567. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Disparities in Social Determinants of Health Among Patients Receiving Liver Transplant: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample From 2016 to 2019

Affiliations

Disparities in Social Determinants of Health Among Patients Receiving Liver Transplant: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample From 2016 to 2019

Mahmoud M Mansour et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Liver transplantation is the life-saving standard of care for those with end-stage liver disease. Unfortunately, many patients on the liver transplant list die waiting. Several studies have demonstrated significant differences based on disparities in race, gender, and multiple socioeconomic factors. We sought to evaluate recent disparities among patients receiving liver transplants using the latest available data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), the largest publicly available inpatient care database in the United States. Methods We performed an analysis of discharge data from the NIS between 2016 and 2019. We identified adult patients with chronic liver disease who underwent a liver transplant using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for differences in race, gender, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities among those who received a liver transplant. Results A total of 24,595 liver transplants were performed over the study period. Female gender was independently associated with decreased transplant rates (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-0.89, P < 0.001). Compared to White patients, Black patients had decreased transplant rates (AOR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75-0.99, P = 0.034), as did Native Americans (AOR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.97, P = 0.035). Hispanics and Asian Americans had increased rates of liver transplantation (AOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32, P = 0.022, and 1.36, 95% CI 1.11-1.67, P = 0.003; respectively). The increase in income quartile was associated with an incremental increase in transplant rates. Additionally, patients with private insurance had much higher transplant rates compared to those with Medicare (AOR 2.50, 95% CI 2.31-2.70, P < 0.001) while patients without insurance had the lowest rates of transplantation (AOR 0.18, 95% CI 0.12-0.28, P < 0.001). Conclusions Our analysis demonstrates that race, gender, and other social determinants of health have significant impacts on the likelihood of receiving a liver transplant. Our study, on a national level, confirms previously described disparities in receiving liver transplantation. Patient-level studies are needed to better understand how these variables translate into differing liver transplantation rates.

Keywords: gender equity; health care disparities; liver transplant; nationwide inpatient sample (nis); race inequities; social determinants of health (sdoh); socio-demographic disparity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Adjusted odds ratio graph of the studied demographic variables
Included in the multivariate analysis but not shown in this graph are the region of the hospital, Charlson comorbidity index, and alcoholic cirrhosis p: percentile

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Compressed mortality file 1999-2016 on CDC WONDER online database. [ Apr; 2022 ];http://wonder.cdc.gov/cmf-icd10.html 2017
    1. Sex-based disparities in liver transplant rates in the United States. Mathur AK, Schaubel DE, Gong Q, Guidinger MK, Merion RM. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:1435–1443. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ethical principles in the allocation of human organs. [ Apr; 2022 ];https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/professionals/by-topic/ethical-consider... 2015
    1. The impact of the MELD score on liver transplant allocation and results: an integrative review. Moraes AC, Oliveira PC, Fonseca-Neto OC. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017;30:65–68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. [ Apr; 2022 ];Nelson A. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2594273/ J Natl Med Assoc. 2002 94:666–668. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources