Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 20;5(2):89-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2022.03.010. eCollection 2022 May.

Irreversible electroporation versus radiofrequency ablation for malignant hepatic tumor: A prospective single-center double-arm trial

Affiliations

Irreversible electroporation versus radiofrequency ablation for malignant hepatic tumor: A prospective single-center double-arm trial

Boyu Liu et al. J Interv Med. .

Abstract

Objective: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal ablation technique for the treatment of malignant liver tumors. IRE has demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment of malignant liver tumors and its unique advantages in the treatment of nearby vascular lesions. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and intermediate-term outcomes of IRE and radiofrequency (RF) therapy in malignant liver tumors.

Methods: Twenty-four patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies were included in this prospective, double-arm clinical trial. Patients were randomly divided into the IRE and RF groups. The primary outcome was the efficacy (local ablation control evaluation at 90 days). The secondary outcomes were safety (procedure-related complications at ​≤ ​90 days) and intermediate-term survival (at 24 months).

Results: The ablation assessment at 90 days after surgery with mRECIST for IRE versus RF were 70%, 20%, 0%, and 10% versus 92.9%, 7.1%, 0%, and 0% (CR, PR, SD, and PD, respectively). The complication rates of IRE versus RF with Clavien-Dindo classification were 16.7%, 25%, 0%, 8.3%, and 8.3% versus 8.3%, 50%, 0%, 0%, and 0% (Grade I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively). The average overall survival (OS) was 17.55 months in the IRE group (95% CI 15.13-22.37) and 18.75 months in the RF group (95% CI 12.48-22.61). There was no statistical difference between the IRE and RF groups in terms of efficacy (p ​= ​0.48), safety(p ​= ​0.887), or 24-month OS (p ​= ​0.959).

Conclusions: IRE ablation revealed similar efficacy and safety in a short-term follow-up, and similar OS in mid-term survival as RF ablation in treating malignant hepatic tumors.

Keywords: Efficacy; Intermediate-term survival; Irreversible electroporation; Prospective trial; Radiofrequency ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier estimated overall survival of enrolled patients in IRE/RF group.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The white arrow indicates the lesion and the black arrow indicates the left portal vein branch. Occlusion of left portal vein occurred after ablation (Right) compared with before IRE ablation (Left).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The images above showed hepatic artery and portal vein morphology before IRE ablation. The hepatic artery was normal and the portal vein happened to multiple stenosis after IRE ablation (bottom of images).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen M.S., Li J.Q., Zheng Y., et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing percutaneous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2006;243:321–328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang D., Zhuang B., Wang Y., et al. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20:402. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuipers E.J., Grady W.M., Lieberman D., et al. Colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2015;1:15065. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wendler J.J., Fischbach K., Ricke J., et al. Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): standardization of terminology and reporting criteria for analysis and comparison. Pol J Radiol. 2016;81:54–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davalos R.V., Mir I.L., Rubinsky B. Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33:223–231. - PubMed