Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023;17(5):1181-1200.
doi: 10.1007/s11590-022-01914-5. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

Sparse and risk diversification portfolio selection

Affiliations
Review

Sparse and risk diversification portfolio selection

Qian Li et al. Optim Lett. 2023.

Abstract

Portfolio risk management has become more important since some unpredictable factors, such as the 2008 financial crisis and the recent COVID-19 crisis. Although the risk can be actively managed by risk diversification, the high transaction cost and managerial concerns ensue by over diversifying portfolio risk. In this paper, we jointly integrate risk diversification and sparse asset selection into mean-variance portfolio framework, and propose an optimal portfolio selection model labeled as JMV. The weighted piecewise quadratic approximation is considered as a penalty promoting sparsity for the asset selection. The variance associated with the marginal risk regard as another penalty term to diversify the risk. By exposing the feature of JMV, we prove that the KKT point of JMV is the local minimizer if the regularization parameter satisfies a mild condition. To solve this model, we introduce the accelerated proximal gradient (APG) algorithm [Wen in SIAM J. Optim 27:124-145, 2017], which is one of the most efficient first-order large-scale algorithm. Meanwhile, the APG algorithm is linearly convergent to a local minimizer of the JMV model. Furthermore, empirical analysis consistently demonstrate the theoretical results and the superiority of the JMV model.

Keywords: Accelerated proximal algorithm; Linear convergence; Non-convex regularization; Sparse portfolio selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
No, Sh, s2 and MMR for Optimal Portfolios Generated by JMV
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The smallest eigenvalue of Hessian matrix for different λ1 and λ2
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Evolution of portfolio values for S &P 500
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Evolution of portfolio values for FF 48
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Evolution of portfolio values for FF 100
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Comparisons of iterations of three first-order algorithms

Similar articles

References

    1. Brodie J, Daubechies I, Mol CD, Giannone D, Loris I. Sparse and stable markowitz portfolios. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007;106(30):12267–12272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904287106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck A, Teboulle M. A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2009;2:183–202. doi: 10.1137/080716542. - DOI
    1. Candès EJ, Wakin MB, Boyd SP. Enhancing sparsity by reweighted 1 minimization. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 2008;14(5):877–905. doi: 10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x. - DOI
    1. Chartrand R. Exact reconstruction of sparse signals via nonconvex minimization. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 2007;14(10):707–710. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2007.898300. - DOI
    1. Chartrand R, Staneva V. Restricted isometry properties and nonconvex compressive sensing. Inverse Probl. 2008;24(3):20–35. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/3/035020. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources