Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 20;17(1):1318-1324.
doi: 10.1515/med-2022-0518. eCollection 2022.

In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design

Affiliations

In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design

Michael Worlicek et al. Open Med (Wars). .

Abstract

Up to 20% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not satisfied with the result. Several designs of new implants try to rebuild natural knee kinematics. We hypothesized that an innovative implant design leads to better results concerning femoral rollback compared to an established implant design. For this pilot study, 21 patients were examined during TKA, receiving either an innovative (ATTUNETM Knee System (DePuy Inc.), n = 10) or an established (PFCTM (DePuy Inc.), n = 11) knee system. All patients underwent computer navigation. Knee kinematics was assessed after implantation. Outcome measure was anterior-posterior translation between femur and tibia. We were able to demonstrate a significantly higher femoral rollback in the innovative implant group (p < 0.001). The mean rollback of the innovative system was 11.00 mm (95%-confidence interval [CI], 10.77-11.24), of the established system 8.12 mm (95%-CI, 7.84-8.42). This study revealed a significantly increased lateral as well as medial femoral rollback of knees with the innovative prosthesis design. Our intraoperative finding needs to be confirmed using fluoroscopic or radiographic three-dimensional matching under full-weight-bearing conditions after complete recovery from surgery.

Keywords: femoral rollback; knee arthroplasty; knee kinematics; navigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The senior author cooperates with Open Medicine as Editor. This has not influenced the peer-review process.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraoperative screenshot shows improvement of the leg axis (pink: preoperative; yellow: postoperative) and the tibial contact points of the femur during flexion (femoral rollback).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The line chart shows the mean course of femoral rollback of both groups (attune and PFC). With increasing flexion, the femoral rollback is rising, comparable to the healthy knee, with more rollback in group 1.

References

    1. Robertsson O, Dunbar MJ. Patient satisfaction compared with general health and disease-specific questionnaires in knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(4):476–82. 10.1054/arth.2001.22395a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yu CH, Walker PS, Dewar ME. The effect of design variables of condylar total knees on the joint forces in step climbing based on a computer model. J Biomech. 2001;34(8):1011–21. - PubMed
    1. Bin SI, Nam TS. Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(4):350–5. 10.1007/s00167-006-0202-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Padua R, Ceccarelli E, Bondi R, Campi A, Padua L. Range of motion correlates with patient perception of TKA outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:174–7. 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318046ccb7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pandit H, van Duren BH, Price M, Tilley S, Gill HS, Thomas NP, et al. Constraints in posterior-stabilised TKA kinematics: a comparison of two generations of an implant. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(12):2800–9. 10.1007/s00167-012-2233-x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources