Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 8:19:10.
doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i10.8855. eCollection 2022.

Comparison of the Success Rate of Filled and Unfilled Resin-Based Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Comparison of the Success Rate of Filled and Unfilled Resin-Based Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Elmira Bagheri et al. Front Dent. .

Abstract

Objectives: Incorporation of fillers might improve the physical properties of sealants. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the retention and caries development rate of filled and unfilled fissure sealants. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched until October 24, 2019. The risk of bias (ROB) was assessed for the included studies based on the Cochrane collaboration common scheme for bias, and the meta-analysis was performed through a random effects model. Results: The search resulted in 6,336 unrepeated relevant studies. After the title, abstract and full-text screening, 19 studies with 26 comparing groups were finally included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. According to the included studies, both retention rate and caries development in filled and unfilled resin-based sealants did not significantly differ within 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion: Since there was no significant difference in the retention rate and caries development between filled and unfilled sealants, it seems that the final decision should be made uniquely for each patient according to the type of fissure, patient's age, habits, etc.

Keywords: Composite Resins; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pit and Fissure Sealants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of literature search and selection procedure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Quality assessment of included studies using risk of bias (ROB) assessment A: ROB summary and B: ROB graph. +: low; −: high; ?: unclear
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plots of the retention rate and caries development of filled and unfilled resin-based fissure sealants at different follow-up durations. 1a,2a,3a: retention rate, 1b,2b,3b: caries development
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Funnel plots of standard error according to the log odds ratio. A1, A2: retention rate, B: caries development
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhang Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Chen Y, Zhang Q, Zou J. The clinical effects of laser preparation of tooth surfaces for fissure sealants placement : a systematic review and meta- analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2019 Sep;19(1):203. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prabakar J, John J, Arumugham IM, Kumar RP, Srisakthi D. Comparative evaluation of retention, cariostatic effect and discoloration of conventional and hydrophilic sealants - A single blinded randomized split mouth clinical trial. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Sep;9(Suppl 2):S233–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cvikl B, Moritz A, Bekes K. Pit and fissure sealants-A comprehensive review. Dent J (Basel) 2018 Jun;6(2):18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Naaman R, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi N. The use of pit and fissure sealants-A literature review. Dent J (Basel) 2017 Dec;5(4):34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yazici AR1, Karaman E, Baseren M, Tuncer D, Yazici E US. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled fissure sealant placed with different adhesive systems: 24-month results. Oper Dent. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):642–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources