Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 22:10:917929.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917929. eCollection 2022.

Vaccine Refusal: A Preliminary Interdisciplinary Investigation

Affiliations

Vaccine Refusal: A Preliminary Interdisciplinary Investigation

Linda A W Brakel et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Many people who generally receive standard recommended inoculations refuse to partake of COVID-19 vaccines, preventatives that are effective, safe, and life-saving amidst the current pandemic. Our quest is to understand this puzzling and dangerous phenomenon, as it exists among US and UK citizens, whom in other respects would be regarded as quite regular. We will discuss Vaccine Refusal compared with two better understood phenomena: addiction, and akrasia, along with the related matters of human action, intention, agency, will, and identity. Vaccine Refusal, we will argue, appears to be rewarded by "informational reinforcement" leading to heightened arousal, along with increases in self-esteem resulting from "bucking the trend," asserting one's "superior" understanding, and "tribal identity" in acting against social norms. These factors provide an overall reward amounting to satisfaction that outweighs the well-known consequences of COVID-19 infections. Our investigations will also lead us to a pair of epistemological hypotheses about two subtypes of the Vaccine Refusers under consideration here.

Keywords: addiction; akrasia; dual-processes; future-discounting; identity; informational-reinforcement; non-knowing; rationalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. CDC website . (2021). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-cov/vaccines/effectiveness/work.html updated (accessed April 4, 2022).
    1. Leonhardt D. Irrational skepticism vs. power of boosters. New York Times. (2022), p. A14.
    1. Krugman P. Biden vs. the friends of Covid. New York Times. (2022), p. A21.
    1. Kacelnik A. Meanings of rationality. In: Hurley S, Nudds M, editors. Rational Animals? Oxford: Oxford University Press; (2006), p. 87–106. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528272.003.0002 - DOI
    1. Rubinstein A. Lecture Notes in Microeconomic Theory: The Economic Agent. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; (2012). 10.1515/9781400842469 - DOI