Community engagement in the development and implementation of a rural road safety campaign: Steps and lessons learned
- PMID: 35937507
- PMCID: PMC9348780
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101282
Community engagement in the development and implementation of a rural road safety campaign: Steps and lessons learned
Abstract
Introduction: Rural crashes result in fatality rates twice as high as urban, after accounting for vehicle miles traveled, and those involving farm vehicles tend to be the most severe. Farm vehicle crash interventions have focused on the farm equipment (e.g., lighting and marking) or the farm vehicle operator (e.g., training), despite crashes being most frequently caused by other vehicle driver actions. Community-based campaigns focused on rural drivers have potential to influence driver behavior. The objective of this study was to describe the role, formation, and lessons learned from a community advisory board (CAB) in the development and dissemination of a community-based rural roadway safety campaign.
Methods: The CAB provided campaign input through quarterly meetings and email. The campaign had three main CAB and crash data-informed messages: 1) Slow Down, 2) Leave More Space, and 3) Avoid Passing. The CAB led campaign activities to publicize the message, distribute swag, and organize event logistics. To evaluate CAB effectiveness and inform future community engagement efforts, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews with CAB members in July 2020. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and codes were categorized into five main themes.
Results: Overall, CAB membership was described as an overwhelmingly positive experience in terms of the CAB structure, culture fostered among the group, responsibilities, and time commitment. Board members reported successful campaign implementation, gave positive feedback regarding the research team's engagement efforts, and provided valuable recommendations for future campaigns (e.g., adding social media components, expansion of CAB age and industry diversity, and increasing group bonding activities).
Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrate the instrumental role and logistics involved in engagement of community advisors for the development and implementation of a rural roadway safety campaign. Steps and lessons from this study can be applied to other community-level injury and violence prevention topics, with a particular focus on rural communities.
Keywords: advisory board; farm equipment; interviews; process evaluation; qualitative.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors do not have any competing interests to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Developing an Online Community Advisory Board (CAB) of Parents From Social Media to Co-Design an Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Intervention: Participatory Research Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 16;9:e65986. doi: 10.2196/65986. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40239189 Free PMC article.
-
Advancing engagement and capacity for rural cancer control: a mixed-methods case study of a Community-Academic Advisory Board in the Appalachia region of Southwest Virginia.Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 22;7(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00285-y. Res Involv Engagem. 2021. PMID: 34158127 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of crashes with farm equipment that increase potential for injury.J Rural Health. 2007 Autumn;23(4):339-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00112.x. J Rural Health. 2007. PMID: 17868241
-
Analysis of risk factors affecting driver injury and crash injury with drivers under the influence of alcohol (DUI) and non-DUI.Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Nov 16;17(8):796-802. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1168924. Epub 2016 Apr 11. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016. PMID: 27064506 Review.
-
A Systematic Review of Large Agriculture Vehicles Use and Crash Incidents on Public Roads.J Agromedicine. 2020 Jan;25(1):14-27. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1593275. Epub 2019 Mar 30. J Agromedicine. 2020. PMID: 30879394
Cited by
-
Road safety, health equity, and the built environment: perspectives of transport and injury prevention professionals in five Canadian municipalities.BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 22;23(1):1211. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16115-7. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37349745 Free PMC article.
References
-
- NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts: Rural/Urban Comparison of Traffic Fatalities. DOT HS 812 957. 2020. March 15, 2021]; Available from: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812957.
-
- Scott E, et al., Characteristics of Agriculture Related Motor Vehicle Crashes in Rural New York State. Journal of Agromedicine, 2020. 25(2): p. 173–178. - PubMed
-
- Harland KK, Greenan M, and Ramirez M, Not just a rural occurrence: Differences in agricultural equipment crash characteristics by rural–urban crash site and proximity to town. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2014. 70: p. 8–13. - PubMed
-
- Peek-Asa C, et al., Characteristics of crashes with farm equipment that increase potential for injury. J Rural Health, 2007. 23(4): p. 339–47. - PubMed
-
- GPCAH. Epidemiology of Farm Equipment Crashes in Nine Midwest States. 2014. March 19, 2021]; Available from: https://gpcah.public-health.uiowa.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Epidemi....
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources