Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 20:9:918912.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.918912. eCollection 2022.

Simulation models for learning local skin flap design and execution: A systematic review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Simulation models for learning local skin flap design and execution: A systematic review of the literature

Eleni Hadjikyriacou et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Early exposure to practical skills in surgical training is essential in order to master technically demanding procedures such as the design and execution of local skin flaps. Changes in working patterns, increasing subspecializations, centralization of surgical services, and the publication of surgeon-specific outcomes have all made hands-on-training in a clinical environment increasingly difficult to achieve for the junior surgeon. This has been further compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. This necessitates alternative methods of surgical skills training. To date, there are no standardized or ideal simulation models for local skin flap teaching.

Aim: This systematic review aims to summarize and evaluate local skin flap simulation and teaching models published in the literature.

Materials and methods: A systematic review protocol was developed and undertaken in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Key search terms encompassed both "local skin flaps" and "models" or "surgical simulation". These were combined using Boolean logic and used to search Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were collected and screened according to the inclusion criteria. The final included articles were graded for their level of evidence and recommendation based on a modified educational Oxford Center for evidence-based medicine classification system and assessed according to the CRe-DEPTH tool for articles describing training interventions in healthcare professionals.

Results: A total of 549 articles were identified, resulting in the inclusion of 16 full-text papers. Four articles used 3D simulators for local flap teaching and training, while two articles described computer simulation as an alternative method for local flap practicing. Four models were silicone based, while gelatin, Allevyn dressings, foam rubber, and ethylene-vinyl acetate-based local flap simulators were also described. Animal models such as pigs head, porcine skin, chicken leg, and rat, as well as a training model based on fresh human skin excised from body-contouring procedures, were described. Each simulation and teaching method was assessed by a group of candidates via a questionnaire or evaluation survey grading system. Most of the studies were graded as level of evidence 3 or 4.

Conclusion: Many methods of simulation for the design and execution of local skin flaps have been described. However, most of these have been assessed only in small cohort numbers, and, therefore, larger candidate sizes and a standardized method for assessment are required. Moreover, some proposed simulators, although promising, are in a very preliminary stage of development. Further development and evaluation of promising high-fidelity models is required in order to improve training in such a complex area of surgery.

Keywords: local flap design; local flaps; plastic surgery training; simulation models; teaching; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred reporting items for conducting systematic reviews of included studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart indicating the number of included articles describing each category of simulation model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Barakat MF, Sarker SK, Standfield N, et al. Validation of open inguinal hernia repair simulation model: a randomized controlled educational trial. Am J Surg. (2014) 208(2):295–301. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang SF, Powell A, Srinivasan S, Kim JC, Baker SR, Green GE, et al. Addressing the pandemic training deficiency: filling the void with simulation in facial reconstruction. Laryngoscope. (2021) 131(8):E2444-8. 10.1002/lary.29490 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarker S, Patel B. Simulation and surgical training. Int J Clin Practise. (2007) 61(12):2120–5. 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01435.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tan SSY, Sarker SK. Simulation in surgery: a review. Scott Med J. (2011) 56(2):104–9. 10.1258/smj.2011.011098 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simman R. Wound closure and the reconstructive ladder in plastic surgery. J Am Coll Certif Wound Spec. (2009) 1(1):6–11. 10.1016/j.jcws.2008.10.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources