Does power setting impact surgical outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 35937664
- PMCID: PMC9326704
- DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2022.0104
Does power setting impact surgical outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this article was to enumerate the differences in immediate and postoperative outcomes for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) performed with low-power (LP) or high-power (HP) laser settings through a systematic review of comparative studies.
Material and methods: We performed a systematic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. Potential clinical differences among LP and HP HoLEP were determined using the PICOS (Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome Study type) model, where outcomes were surgical time, operative efficiency, postoperative catheterization time, length of hospital stay, blood transfusion, incontinence rate, maximum urinary flow rate (QMax) and International Prostatic Symptom score (IPSS). Retrospective, prospective nonrandomized, randomized studies, and meeting abstracts were considered.
Results: A total of five studies were included for meta-analysis. No significant differences between LP and HP HoLEP were evidenced in terms of intraoperative variables (surgical time, surgical efficiency); postoperative outcomes (length of stay, length of catheterization); postoperative complications; functional results (IPSS; Qmax). Urinary incontinence rate did not differ between the two groups (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.362.47, p = 0.91).
Conclusions: The study shows equal outcomes in outcomes from HoLEP performed with LP or HP energy settings. Even if further comparative studies are still needed to increase the level of evidence, those results encourage a further clinical adoption of LP HoLEP.
Keywords: benign prostatic hyperplasia; high-power laser; holmium laser; low-power laser.
Copyright by Polish Urological Association.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures






References
-
- Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006;50:1306–1314. - PubMed
-
- Gilling PJ, Kennett K, Das AK, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) combined with transurethral tissue morcellation: an update on the early clinical experience. J Endourol. 1998;12:457–459. - PubMed
-
- Vincent MW, Gilling PJ. HoLEP has come of age. World J Urol. 2015;33:487–493. - PubMed
-
- Scoffone CM, Cracco CM. Prostate enucleation, better with low or high-power holmium laser? A systematic review. Arch Esp Urol. 2020;73:745–752. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous