Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;26(3):460-470.
doi: 10.1080/10888691.2020.1861945. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

Youth Advocacy Varies in Relation to Adult Advisor Characteristics and Practices in Gender-Sexuality Alliances

Affiliations

Youth Advocacy Varies in Relation to Adult Advisor Characteristics and Practices in Gender-Sexuality Alliances

V Paul Poteat et al. Appl Dev Sci. 2022.

Abstract

With growing attention to youth's efforts to address sexual and gender diversity issues in Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs), there remains limited research on adult advisors. Do advisor characteristics predict their youth members' advocacy? Among 58 advisors of 38 GSAs, we considered whether advisor attributes predicted greater advocacy by youth in these GSAs (n = 366) over the school year. GSAs varied in youth advocacy over the year. Youth in GSAs whose advisors reported longer years of service, devoted more time to GSA efforts each week, and employed more structure to meetings (to a point, with a curvilinear effect), reported greater relative increases in advocacy over the year (adjusting for initial advocacy and total meetings that year). Relative changes in advocacy were not associated with whether advisors received a stipend, training, or whether GSAs had co-advisors. Continued research should consider how advisors of GSAs and other social justice-oriented groups foster youth advocacy.

Keywords: Adult mentors; Advocacy; Extracurricular groups; GSA; Lesbian; bisexual; gay; social justice; transgender youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Curvilinear association between the degree of structure to GSA meetings and GSAs’ level of advocacy done over the school year.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akiva T, Carey RL, Cross AB, Delale-O’Connor L, & Brown MR (2017). Reasons youth engage in activism programs: Social justice or sanctuary? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 53, 20–30.
    1. American Psychological Association. (2018). APA resolution on support for the expansion of mature minors’ ability to participate in research. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/about/policy/resolution-minors-research.pdf
    1. Arnold ME, & Silliman B (2017). From theory to practice: A critical review of positive youth development program frameworks. Journal of Youth Development, 12, 1–20.
    1. Camino LA (2000). Youth-adult partnerships: Entering new territory in community work and research. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 11–20.
    1. Cammarota J (2016). The praxis of ethnic studies: Transforming second sight into critical consciousness. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19, 233–251.

LinkOut - more resources