Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 22:13:927344.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.927344. eCollection 2022.

Effect of Body Surface Area on Severe Osteoporotic Fractures: A Study of Osteoporosis in Changsha China

Affiliations

Effect of Body Surface Area on Severe Osteoporotic Fractures: A Study of Osteoporosis in Changsha China

Xi-Yu Wu et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Clinical vertebral fractures and femoral neck fractures are severe osteoporotic fractures that increase morbidity and mortality. Anthropometric variables are associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures, but it is not clear whether body surface area (BSA) has an effect on clinically severe osteoporotic fractures. The study included total of 3,694 cases of clinical vertebral fractures and femoral neck fractures (2,670 females and 1,024 males) and 3,694 controls without fractures who were matched with the cases by sex and age. There was a significant positive correlation between BSA and bone mineral density (BMD) in female and male fracture patients (females: r = 0.430-0.471, P < 0.001; males: r = 0.338-0.414, P < 0.001). There was a significant systematic increase in BMD in both genders at various skeletal sites, grouped by BSA quartile. The osteoporosis rates of the lumbar spine (97.9%), femoral neck (92.4%) and total hip (87.1%) in the female Q1 group were significantly higher than those in the Q4 group (P < 0.001), which were 80.0%, 57.9% and 36.9%, respectively, in the Q4 group; the osteoporosis rates of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip were 53.9%, 59.4%, and 36.3% in the male Q1 group, and 15.2%, 21.9%, and 7.03% in the Q4 group, which were significantly lower than those in the Q1 group (P < 0.001). In age-adjusted Cox regression models, the risk of fracture in the remaining three groups (Q2, Q3, and Q4) for weight, BMI, and BSA for both genders, compared with the highest quartile (Q1 by descending quartile stratification) were significantly higher. In models adjusted for age and BMD, only men in the BSA Q3 (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.09-2.19) and BSA Q4 groups (HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.05-1.87) had significantly higher fracture risks. In models adjusted for age, height, weight, BMI, and BSA, low BMD was the greatest fracture risks for both sexes. Our results showed that BSA was closely related to BMD, prevalence of osteoporosis, and fracture risk, and that a decline in BSA may be a new potential risk factor for osteoporotic fractures in Chinese men.

Keywords: body surface area; bone mineral density; fracture risk; osteoporosis; osteoporotic fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation scatter diagrams of the body surface area (BSA) with BMD at various skeletal sites. LS, lumbar spine; BMD, bone mineral density; FN, femoral neck; Hip, total hip.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes of BMD at various skeletal sites in body surface area of fracture patients stratified by quartile. BMD, bone mineral density; Q1, first quartile; Q2, second quartile; Q3, third quartile; Q4, fourth quartile; LS, lumbar spine (L1–L4); FN, femoral neck; TH, total hip. a P < 0.001 compared with Q2, Q3 and Q4. b P = 0.001 to < 0.001 compared with Q3 and Q4. c P = 0.003 to < 0.001 compared with Q4.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prevalence rate of osteoporosis at various skeletal regions according to body surface area quartile. Q1, first quartile; Q2, second quartile; Q3, third quartile; Q4, fourth quartile. a P = 0.003 to < 0.001 compared with Q2, Q3 and Q4. b P = 0.028 to < 0.001 compared with Q3 and Q4. c P = 0.001 to < 0.001 compared with Q4.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sambrook P, Cooper C. Osteoporosis. Lancet (2006) 367(9527):2010–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68891-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts SE, Goldacre MJ. Time Trends and Demography of Mortality After Fractured Neck of Femur in an English Population, 1968-98: Database Study. BMJ (2003) 327(7418):771–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7418.771 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An Estimate of the Worldwide Prevalence, Mortality and Disability Associated With Hip Fracture. Osteoporos Int (2004) 15:897–902. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1627-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parker M, Johansen A. Hip Fracture. BMJ (2006) 333(7557):27–30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7557.27 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, et al. . Mortality After Osteoporotic Fractures. Osteoporos Int (2004) 15(1):38–42. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1490-4 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types