Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 6:378:e069901.
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069901.

Serious adverse event rates and reoperation after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: population based cohort study

Affiliations

Serious adverse event rates and reoperation after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: population based cohort study

Jonathan L Rees et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To provide clinicians and patients with accurate risk estimates of serious adverse events after common elective shoulder arthroscopic procedures, including reoperation within one year.

Design: Population based cohort study.

Setting: Hospital Episode Statistics for NHS England, including civil registration mortality data from the Office for National Statistics.

Participants: 288 250 arthroscopic shoulder procedures performed in 261 248 patients aged ≥16 years between 1 April 2009 and 31 March 2017. Elective procedures were grouped into subacromial decompression, rotator cuff repair, acromioclavicular joint excision, glenohumeral stabilisation, and frozen shoulder release.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were rates of serious adverse events (mortality, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, stroke, and urinary tract infection) requiring inpatient care within 90 days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were specific adverse event rates at 90 days, and reoperations (including for deep infection) within one year.

Results: The overall rate of complications within 90 days after arthroscopic shoulder surgery (including reoperation) was low at 1.2% (95% confidence interval 1.2% to 1.3%), with one in 81 patients at risk, and varied according to type of procedure, from 0.6% (0.5% to 0.8%) for glenohumeral stabilisation to 1.7% (1.5% to 1.8%) for frozen shoulder release. After adjustment for age, comorbidities, and sex, no effect of procedure type was observed. Pneumonia was the most common adverse event (0.3%, 0.3% to 0.4%), with one in 303 patients at risk. Pulmonary embolic events were rare, at 0.1% (0.1% to 0.1%), with one in 1428 patients at risk. At one year, the overall rate for reoperation was 3.8% (3.8% to 3.9%), with one in 26 patients at risk, ranging from 2.7% (2.5% to 3.0%) for glenohumeral stabilisation to 5.7% (5.4% to 6.1%) for frozen shoulder release. The overall rate of further surgery for deep infection was low, at 0.1% (0.1% to 0.1%), with one in 1111 patients at risk, but was higher after rotator cuff repair (0.2%, 0.2% to 0.2%), with one in 526 patients at risk. Over the study period the number of arthroscopic shoulder procedures increased, except for subacromial decompression, which decreased.

Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that risks of serious adverse events associated with common shoulder arthroscopy procedures are low. Nevertheless, serious complications do occur, and include the risk of reoperation in one in 26 patients within one year.

Study registration: Clinical.

Trials: gov NCT03573765.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; JCEL reports grants from Versus Arthritis, grants from Medical Research Council, outside the submitted work. DPA reports grants from Amgen for speaker services and advisory board membership, consultancy fees from UCB Biopharma and Astra Zeneca, and grants from European Medicines Agency and UCB Biopharma all outside the submitted work. DPA also reports support for training programmes from Janssen, on behalf of Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI)-funded European Health Data and Evidence Network, and Synapse Management Partners. These programmes run by DPA are open to external participants. AJC reports grants from the National Institute for Health and Care Research and grants from the Wellcome Trust during the conduct of the study; in addition, AJC has a patent BioPatch issued and sits on Novartis Musculoskeletal advisory board and UKRI Advanced Pain Discovery programme; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Study flowchart. SLAP=superior labral anterior posterior
Fig 2
Fig 2
Density plot showing age distributions by type of arthroscopic shoulder procedure
Fig 3
Fig 3
Incidence of additional adverse events within first year post-surgery

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moseley JB, O’Malley K, Petersen NJ, et al. . A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 2002;347:81-8. 10.1056/NEJMoa013259. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pabinger C, Geissler A. Utilization rates of hip arthroplasty in OECD countries. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014;22:734-41. 10.1016/j.joca.2014.04.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. GBD 2017 . Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators SL, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018;392:1789-858. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abram SGF, Judge A, Beard DJ, Wilson HA, Price AJ. Temporal trends and regional variation in the rate of arthroscopic knee surgery in England: analysis of over 1.7 million procedures between 1997 and 2017. Has practice changed in response to new evidence? Br J Sports Med 2019;53:1533-8. 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099414. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Judge A, Murphy RJ, Maxwell R, et al. . Temporal trends and geographical variation in the use of subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair of the shoulder in England. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:70-4. 10.1302/0301-620X.96B1.32556 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data