The role of emotion regulation in couples' stress communication and dyadic coping responses
- PMID: 35938781
- DOI: 10.1002/smi.3186
The role of emotion regulation in couples' stress communication and dyadic coping responses
Abstract
Partners' ability to cope together in the face of stress-commonly known as dyadic coping (DC)-can promote individual and couple well-being. However, little is known about the predictors of DC, including partners' emotion regulation. This study examined (a) whether emotion regulation abilities are associated with partners' DC responses, and (b) whether these associations are mediated by partners' engagement in stress communication in a community sample of different-gender couples (N = 239). Couples completed self-report measures to assess their stress communication and DC responses (supportive, negative, and common DC) and six dimensions of emotion regulation (emotional awareness, acceptance, clarity, goal-orientation, regulation strategies, and impulse control). Results from structural equation modelling analysis confirmed expected associations between stress communication and partners' supportive and common DC responses. Additionally, only associations with women's emotion regulation emerged significant. First, women's emotional awareness was associated with more supportive DC from men and common DC through increases in women's stress communication. Second, women who endorsed emotional acceptance engaged in less supportive DC towards their partner. Third, women's goal-orientation was associated with less supportive DC from each partner and common DC through decreases in men's stress communication. There were no associations with men's emotion regulation. Collectively, findings suggest that although women may manage their negative emotions in ways that are adaptive for their individual well-being, these benefits may not always affect relationship functioning in the same way. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.
Keywords: communication; couples; dyadic coping; emotion regulation; stress.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Couples' co-regulation dynamics as a function of perceived partner dyadic coping.Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Nov;34(6):597-611. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1912740. Epub 2021 Apr 9. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021. PMID: 33834918
-
Associations between dyadic coping and supportive care needs: findings from a study with hematologic cancer patients and their partners.Support Care Cancer. 2017 May;25(5):1445-1454. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3541-3. Epub 2016 Dec 16. Support Care Cancer. 2017. PMID: 27987096
-
Does Dyadic Coping Predict Couples' Postpartum Psychosocial Adjustment? A Dyadic Longitudinal Study.Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 25;11:561091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561091. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33101131 Free PMC article.
-
Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis.Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:28-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 29. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015. PMID: 26295276 Review.
-
A literature review of the relationship between dyadic coping and dyadic outcomes in cancer couples.Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct;54:102035. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102035. Epub 2021 Sep 11. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021. PMID: 34520996 Review.
Cited by
-
Gender differences between dyadic coping and emotional distress in young and middle-aged cancer patients and spouses.Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 7;33(7):665. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09714-0. Support Care Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40622628
-
The actor-partner interdependence model of fertility stress and marital quality among couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: The mediating role of dyadic coping.Stress Health. 2024 Dec;40(6):e3483. doi: 10.1002/smi.3483. Epub 2024 Oct 22. Stress Health. 2024. PMID: 39435725 Free PMC article.
-
Brief Manual for Multi-Modal Motion-Assisted Memory Desensitization and Reconsolidation Therapy for the Treatment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Aug 11;35(Suppl 1):S122-S134. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2025.241028. Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025. PMID: 40865053 Free PMC article.
-
Pregnant Women's Dyadic Coping and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study Utilizing Latent Profile Analysis.Int J Womens Health. 2024 May 31;16:1009-1022. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S458763. eCollection 2024. Int J Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 38835832 Free PMC article.
-
The role of sexual communication in the relationship between emotion regulation and sexual functioning in women: The impact of age and relationship status.Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Jul-Sep;24(3):100482. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100482. Epub 2024 Jul 5. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39071855 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Acitelli, L. K. (1992). Gender differences in relationship awareness and marital satisfaction among young married couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181015
-
- American Psychological Association [APA]. (2017). Stress in America [Data file]. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2017/state-nation.pdf
-
- American Psychological Association [APA]. (2022). Stress in America: [Data file]. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2022/state-nation.pdf
-
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Weighted least squares estimation with missing data (Vol. 2010, pp. 1-10). Mplus technical appendix.
-
- Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources