Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;39(2):309-322.
doi: 10.1002/smi.3186. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

The role of emotion regulation in couples' stress communication and dyadic coping responses

Affiliations

The role of emotion regulation in couples' stress communication and dyadic coping responses

Mariana K Falconier et al. Stress Health. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Partners' ability to cope together in the face of stress-commonly known as dyadic coping (DC)-can promote individual and couple well-being. However, little is known about the predictors of DC, including partners' emotion regulation. This study examined (a) whether emotion regulation abilities are associated with partners' DC responses, and (b) whether these associations are mediated by partners' engagement in stress communication in a community sample of different-gender couples (N = 239). Couples completed self-report measures to assess their stress communication and DC responses (supportive, negative, and common DC) and six dimensions of emotion regulation (emotional awareness, acceptance, clarity, goal-orientation, regulation strategies, and impulse control). Results from structural equation modelling analysis confirmed expected associations between stress communication and partners' supportive and common DC responses. Additionally, only associations with women's emotion regulation emerged significant. First, women's emotional awareness was associated with more supportive DC from men and common DC through increases in women's stress communication. Second, women who endorsed emotional acceptance engaged in less supportive DC towards their partner. Third, women's goal-orientation was associated with less supportive DC from each partner and common DC through decreases in men's stress communication. There were no associations with men's emotion regulation. Collectively, findings suggest that although women may manage their negative emotions in ways that are adaptive for their individual well-being, these benefits may not always affect relationship functioning in the same way. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.

Keywords: communication; couples; dyadic coping; emotion regulation; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Acitelli, L. K. (1992). Gender differences in relationship awareness and marital satisfaction among young married couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181015
    1. American Psychological Association [APA]. (2017). Stress in America [Data file]. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2017/state-nation.pdf
    1. American Psychological Association [APA]. (2022). Stress in America: [Data file]. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2022/state-nation.pdf
    1. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Weighted least squares estimation with missing data (Vol. 2010, pp. 1-10). Mplus technical appendix.
    1. Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018

LinkOut - more resources