Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0085322.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00853-22. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

Analytical Sensitivity of Eight Different SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-Detecting Rapid Tests for Omicron-BA.1 Variant

Affiliations

Analytical Sensitivity of Eight Different SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-Detecting Rapid Tests for Omicron-BA.1 Variant

Meriem Bekliz et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

The emergence of each novel SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern (VOC) requires investigation of its potential impact on the performance of diagnostic tests in use, including antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs). Although anecdotal reports have been circulating that the newly emerged Omicron-BA.1 variant is in principle detectable by Ag-RDTs, few data on sensitivity are available. We have performed (i) analytical sensitivity testing with cultured virus in eight Ag-RDTs and (ii) retrospective testing in duplicates with clinical samples from vaccinated individuals with Omicron-BA.1 (n = 59) or Delta (n = 54) breakthrough infection on seven Ag-RDTs. Overall, in our analytical study we have found heterogenicity between Ag-RDTs for detecting Omicron-BA.1. When using cultured virus, we observed a trend toward lower endpoint sensitivity for Omicron-BA.1 detection than for earlier circulating SARS-CoV-2 and the other VOCs. In our retrospective study, the detection of Delta and Omicron-BA.1 was assessed in a comparable set of stored clinical samples using seven Ag-RDTs. Four hundred ninety-seven of all 826 tests (60.17%) performed on Omicron-BA.1 samples were positive, compared to 489/756 (64.68%) for Delta samples. In the analytical study, the sensitivity for both Omicron-BA.1 and Delta between the Ag-RDTs was variable. All seven Ag-RDTs showed comparable sensitivities to detect Omicron-BA.1 and Delta in the retrospective study. IMPORTANCE Sensitivity for detecting Omicron-BA.1 shows high heterogenicity between Ag-RDTs, necessitating a careful consideration when using these tests to guide infection prevention measures. Analytical and retrospective testing is a proxy and timely solution to generate rapid performance data, but it is not a replacement for clinical evaluations, which are urgently needed. Biological and technical reasons for detection failure by some Ag-RDTs need to be further investigated.

Keywords: COVID-19; Omicron variant; Omicron-BA.1 variant; SARS-CoV-2; antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests; variants of concern.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Heatmap based on log10 PFU per milliliter (A) and on RNA viral load ranges (B) for analytical sensitivity of eight Ag-RDTs with an early-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 isolate (B.1.610) and the VOCs Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta in comparison to Omicron-BA.1. Note that analytical sensitivities for early-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 B.1.610, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta have already been published before but were added here for consistency reasons and better interpretability of the data on Omicron-BA.1 (15, 30).
FIG 2
FIG 2
Heatmap of retrospective testing of original nasopharyngeal patient swab specimens from Omicron-BA.1 (n = 59) and Delta (n = 54) breakthrough infections in seven Ag-RDTs per SARS-CoV-2 log10 RNA copies per milliliter, performed in duplicates. Infectious virus was detected from all patient specimens unless marked with an asterisk (*, no infectious virus isolated).
FIG 3
FIG 3
Percentage of positive/negative results for Omicron-BA.1 and Delta vaccine breakthrough infections per number of tests performed (Omicron-BA.1, n = 118; Delta, n = 108). ns, nonsignificant.

References

    1. Nordgren J, Sharma S, Olsson H, Jämtberg M, Falkeborn T, Svensson L, Hagbom M. 2021. SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: high sensitivity to detect infectious virus. J Clin Virol 140:104846. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104846. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. 2020. Antigen-detection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection using rapid immunoassays. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/antigen-detection-in-the-diagnos.... Accessed 28 April 2021.
    1. Mina MJ, Parker R, Larremore DB. 2020. Rethinking Covid-19 test sensitivity - a strategy for containment. N Engl J Med 383:e120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2025631. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. 2021. Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on....
    1. World Health Organization. 2022. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/en/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants/. Accessed 8 December 2021.

Publication types

Supplementary concepts