Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;135(10):3337-3356.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-022-04170-4. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: prediction of the genotype-by-environment interaction in multi-environment breeding trials

Affiliations
Free article

Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: prediction of the genotype-by-environment interaction in multi-environment breeding trials

Pauline Robert et al. Theor Appl Genet. 2022 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Phenomic prediction of wheat grain yield and heading date in different multi-environmental trial scenarios is accurate. Modelling the genotype-by-environment interaction effect using phenomic data is a potentially low-cost complement to genomic prediction. The performance of wheat cultivars in multi-environmental trials (MET) is difficult to predict because of the genotype-by-environment interactions (G × E). Phenomic selection is supposed to be efficient for modelling the G × E effect because it accounts for non-additive effects. Here, phenomic data are near-infrared (NIR) spectra obtained from plant material. While phenomic selection has recently been shown to accurately predict wheat grain yield in single environments, its accuracy needs to be investigated for MET. We used four datasets from two winter wheat breeding programs to test and compare the predictive abilities of phenomic and genomic models for grain yield and heading date in different MET scenarios. We also compared different methods to model the G × E using different covariance matrices based on spectra. On average, phenomic and genomic prediction abilities are similar in all different MET scenarios. Better predictive abilities were obtained when G × E effects were modelled with NIR spectra than without them, and it was better to use all the spectra of all genotypes in all environments for modelling the G × E. To facilitate the implementation of phenomic prediction, we tested MET designs where the NIR spectra were measured only on the genotype-environment combinations phenotyped for the target trait. Missing spectra were predicted with a weighted multivariate ridge regression. Intermediate predictive abilities for grain yield were obtained in a sparse testing scenario and for new genotypes, which shows that phenomic selection is an efficient and practicable prediction method for dealing with G × E.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albrecht T, Wimmer V, Auinger H-J et al (2011) Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize. Theor Appl Genet 123:339–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1587-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allard RW, Bradshaw AD (1964) Implications of genotype-environmental interactions in applied plant breeding 1. Crop Sci 4:503–508. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400050021x - DOI
    1. Azodi CB, Pardo J, VanBuren R et al (2020) Transcriptome-based prediction of complex traits in maize. Plant Cell 32:139–151. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.19.00332 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernardo R (1994) Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci 34:20–25. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400010003x - DOI
    1. Brault C, Lazerges J, Doligez A et al (2021) Interest of phenomic prediction as an alternative to genomic prediction in grapevine. Genetics 31:277

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources