Biochemical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Portoenterostomy for Treating Biliary Atresia and Redo for Failed Portoenterostomy
- PMID: 35939285
- DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0245
Biochemical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Portoenterostomy for Treating Biliary Atresia and Redo for Failed Portoenterostomy
Abstract
Background: Postoperative outcomes of portoenterostomy (PE) and redo-PE were evaluated using selected biochemical markers (SBM) and biochemical status categories (BSC). Methods: Subjects were 70 consecutive PE performed for biliary atresia. SBM were aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT), cholinesterase (ChE), and platelet count (PLT) assessed at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months, and thence, annually for a maximum of 10 years. BSC were as follows: all SBM normal (N-SBM), normal AST/ALT (N-SLT), normal ChE (N-ChE), normal PC (N-PLT), all abnormal (A-SBM), abnormal AST/ALT (A-SLT), abnormal ChE (A-ChE), and abnormal PC (A-PLT). Subjects achieving jaundice clearance (JC) and surviving with native livers (SNL) also had gamma glutamyl transpeptidase assessed. Redo-PE indicated for failed PE was assessed postoperatively using the same SBM/BSC protocol. Results: PE were laparoscopic (LPE; n = 40) or open (OPE; n = 30). Mean age/weight at PE and duration of follow-up were similar. For JC, LPE = 34/40 (85.0%) and OPE = 22/30 (73.3%); P = .23. For SNL, LPE = 29/40 (72.5%) and OPE = 16/30 (53.3%); P = .10. LPE and OPE were similar for SBM/BSC, except for a single significant increase in ALT in OPE at 6 months. Redo-PE was performed 17-180 days (mean 67.1 days) after primary PE. AST was significantly increased at the last preredo assessment 3 months after primary PE; P < .05. After redo, AST decreased and SBM/BSC results were equivalent to nonredo subjects. Conclusion: Postoperative biochemical data for all PE cases were comparable; redo-PE would appear to be viable for restoring SBM, and AST could be valuable as a single marker of deterioration in redo cases.
Keywords: biliary atresia; biochemistry; laparoscopy; portoenterostomy; redo surgery.
Similar articles
-
Comprehensive assessment of prognosis after laparoscopic portoenterostomy for biliary atresia.Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Feb;32(2):109-12. doi: 10.1007/s00383-015-3820-y. Epub 2015 Oct 31. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016. PMID: 26520656
-
Does pneumoperitoneum adversely affect growth, development and liver function in biliary atresia patients after laparoscopic portoenterostomy?Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Jan;31(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3625-4. Epub 2014 Oct 18. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015. PMID: 25326122
-
Comparison of laparoscopic portoenterostomy and open portoenterostomy for the treatment of biliary atresia.Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3143-3152. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06905-9. Epub 2019 Jun 12. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 31190228
-
Native liver survivors of portoenterostomy for biliary atresia with excellent outcome: redefining "successful" portoenterostomy.Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Dec 1;39(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05313-w. Pediatr Surg Int. 2022. PMID: 36454515
-
Laparoscopic portoenterostomy versus open portoenterostomy for the treatment of biliary atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Mar;31(3):261-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-015-3662-7. Epub 2015 Jan 28. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015. PMID: 25627699
Cited by
-
Biliary atresia.Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 Jul 11;10(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00533-x. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024. PMID: 38992031 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous