Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 27;6(24):6140-6150.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007458.

Surgical outcomes in people with hemophilia A taking emicizumab prophylaxis: experience from the HAVEN 1-4 studies

Affiliations

Surgical outcomes in people with hemophilia A taking emicizumab prophylaxis: experience from the HAVEN 1-4 studies

Rebecca Kruse-Jarres et al. Blood Adv. .

Abstract

Many people with hemophilia A (PwHA) undergo surgery in their lifetime, often because of complications of their disease. Emicizumab is the first bispecific monoclonal antibody prophylactic therapy for PwHA, and its efficacy and safety have been previously demonstrated; however, there is a need to build an evidence base on the management of PwHA on emicizumab undergoing surgery. Data from the HAVEN 1-4 phase 3 clinical trials were pooled to provide a summary of all minor and major surgeries in PwHA with or without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors who were receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. Overall, 233 surgeries were carried out during the HAVEN 1-4 trials: 215 minor surgeries (including minor dental and joint procedures, central venous access device placement or removal, and endoscopies) in 115 PwHA (64 with FVIII inhibitors) and 18 major surgeries (including arthroplasty and synovectomy) in 18 PwHA (10 with FVIII inhibitors). Perioperative hemostatic support was at the discretion of the treating physician. Overall, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 33.5 (13.0-49.0) years and the median (IQR) emicizumab exposure time before surgery was 278.0 (177.0-431.0) days. Among the 215 minor surgeries, 141 (65.6%) were managed without additional prophylactic factor concentrate, and of those, 121 (85.8%) were not associated with a postoperative bleed. The majority (15 of 18 [83.3%]) of major surgeries were managed with additional prophylactic factor concentrate. Twelve (80.0%) of these 15 surgeries were associated with no intraoperative or postoperative bleeds. The data demonstrate that minor and major surgeries can be performed safely in PwHA receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. These trials are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02622321, #NCT02795767, #NCT02847637, and #NCT03020160.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: R.K.-J. has received honoraria and consultancy fees from Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., CSL Behring, BioMarin, and CRISPR; has been a member of the speaker’s bureau for Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., and Sanofi; and has received research funding from Genentech, Inc. F.P. has received speaker fees for participating in educational symposia and advisory boards for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Sanofi, SOBI, and Takeda. J.O. has received personal/consultancy fees for travel support, advisory boards, and symposia from Bayer, Biogen Idec, BioMarin, Biotest, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., CSL Behring, Freeline, Grifols, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Sanofi, Spark Therapeutics, SOBI, and Shire/Takeda; and grants from Bayer, Biotest, CSL Behring, Octapharma, and Pfizer. T.C. is an employee of Spark Therapeutics and a former employee of Genentech, Inc. S.C. is an employee and holds stocks in F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. M.Y.D. is an employee of Genentech, Inc. and holds stocks in F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. S.E.C. has received consultancy fees for Bayer, BioMarin, CSL Behring, HEMA Biologics, Pfizer, and Sanofi; research funding from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd./Genentech, Inc.; and is a member on another entity’s Board of Directors or its advisory committees for Hemophilia Alliance and American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network. T.L. has served as a consultant for CSL Behring, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., and SOBI. C.L.K. has received honoraria for participation in advisory boards for Sanofi US, Takeda, and Spark Therapeutics. S.W.P. has served as a consultant to Apcintex, ASC Therapeutics, Bayer, BioMarin, Catalyst Biosciences, CSL Behring, GenVentiv, HEMA Biologics, Freeline, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd./Genentech, Inc., Sangamo Therapeutics, Sanofi, Takeda, Spark Therapeutics, and UniQure. R.H.K. and B.T. are employees and hold stock in Genentech, Inc. C.D., N.S.B., and M.N. are employees of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. M.L. is an employee and holds stocks in F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. I.P.-P. is a former employee of Genentech, Inc. G.Y. reports research funding from Genentech, Inc., Grifols, and Takeda; paid testimony from CSL Behring and Genentech, Inc.; consultancy fees from Apcintex, Bayer, BioMarin, Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi/Genzyme, Spark Therapeutics, and Takeda; and honoraria from Genentech, Inc., Sanofi, and Spark Therapeutics. V.J.-Y. has received reimbursement for attending symposia/congresses, honoraria for speaking, consulting and/or research funding from Takeda, Bayer, CSL Behring, Grifols, Novo Nordisk, SOBI, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Octapharma, BioMarin, Sanofi, and Pfizer.

The current affiliation for T.C. is Spark Therapeutics, Inc., Philadelphia, PA.

The current affiliation for I.P.-P. is Graphite Bio, Inc., South San Francisco, CA.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study designs of the HAVEN 1-4 trials., , , ∗Participants receiving episodic BPAs before study entry were randomized to emicizumab prophylaxis (Arm A) or no emicizumab (Arm B, control), and those receiving prophylactic BPAs before study entry received emicizumab prophylaxis (Arm C). After completing the first 24 weeks of the trial, participants in the control arm (Arm B) could receive emicizumab prophylaxis. A fourth arm also receiving emicizumab prophylaxis (Arm D) comprised participants enrolled after Arms A to C closed. †One participant in HAVEN 1 assigned to an active arm discontinued before the first emicizumab treatment and was excluded from the analyses. ‡Maintenance doses. With the exception of the HAVEN 4 pharmacokinetics run-in cohort (n = 7), all maintenance doses were preceded by loading doses of 3.0 mg/kg QW for 4 weeks. §Adolescents aged 12 to 17 years were also eligible to enroll in HAVEN 2 if they weighed <40 kg; 3 participants were aged 12 to 17. ǁParticipants receiving episodic FVIII before study entry were randomized (2:2:1) to emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg QW (Arm A), emicizumab 3 mg/kg Q2W (Arm B), or no prophylaxis (Arm C, control), and those receiving prophylactic FVIII before study entry received emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg QW (Arm D). ¶One participant in HAVEN 3 assigned to no prophylaxis was lost to follow-up before switching to emicizumab and was therefore not treated; hence, they have been excluded from the analyses. F, factor; QW, once weekely; Q2W, once every 2 weeks; Q4W, once every 4 weeks.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summary of minor surgeries or procedures managed without or with prophylactic factor concentrate. (A) Minor surgeries or procedures performed without prophylactic factor concentrate. (B) Minor surgeries or procedures performed with prophylactic concentrate. n refers to the number of surgeries and procedures. CVAD, central venous access device; post-op, post-operative.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Major surgeries managed with or without prophylactic factor concentrate. post-op, post-operative.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coppola A, Windyga J, Tufano A, Yeung C, Di Minno MN. Treatment for preventing bleeding in people with haemophilia or other congenital bleeding disorders undergoing surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(2) CD009961. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bastounis E, Pikoulis E, Leppäniemi A, Alexiou D, Tsigris C, Tsetis A. General surgery in haemophiliac patients. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76(898):494–495. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, et al. WFH Guidelines for the management of hemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia. 2020;26(suppl 6):1–158. doi: 10.1111/hae.14046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Escobar M, Maahs J, Hellman E, et al. Multidisciplinary management of patients with haemophilia with inhibitors undergoing surgery in the United States: perspectives and best practices derived from experienced treatment centres. Haemophilia. 2012;18(6):971–981. - PubMed
    1. Jiménez-Yuste V, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Alvarez MT, Quintana M, Fernandez I, Hernandez-Navarro F. Controversies and challenges in elective orthopedic surgery in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. Semin Hematol. 2008;45(2 suppl 1):S64–S67. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data