Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 8;12(8):e062392.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062392.

Interventions for and experiences of shared decision-making underpinning reproductive health, family planning options and pregnancy for women with or at high risk of kidney disease: a systematic review and qualitative framework synthesis

Affiliations

Interventions for and experiences of shared decision-making underpinning reproductive health, family planning options and pregnancy for women with or at high risk of kidney disease: a systematic review and qualitative framework synthesis

Leah Mc Laughlin et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine intervention effects and synthesise qualitative research that explored women with or at high risk of kidney disease experiences of shared decision-making in relation to their reproductive health, family planning options and pregnancy.

Design: A systematic review of interventions and a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Data sources: We searched Cochrane, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest, Elsevier, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Web of Science.

Eligibility criteria: Shared decision-making interventions and qualitative studies related to reproductive health involving women with or at high risk of kidney disease published from 1980 until January 2021 in English (clinical settings, global perspective).

Data extraction and synthesis: Titles were screened against the inclusion criteria and full-text articles were reviewed by the whole team. Framework synthesis was undertaken.

Results: We screened 1898 studies. No evidence-based interventions were identified. 18 qualitative studies were included, 11 kidney disease-specific studies and 7 where kidney disease was a common comorbidity. Women frequently felt unprepared and uninformed about their reproductive options. Conversations with healthcare professionals were commonly described as frustrating and unhelpful, often due to a perceived loss of autonomy and a mismatch in preferences and life goals. Examples of shared decision-making were rare. Kidney disease exacerbated societal expectations of traditional gender roles (eg, wife, mother, carer) including capability to have children and associated factors, for example, parenting, (sexual) relationships, body image and independent living (including financial barriers to starting a family). Local interventions were limited to types of counselling. A new health system model was developed to support new interventions.

Conclusion: There is a clear need to establish new interventions, test those already in development and develop new clinical guidance for the management of women with or at high risk of kidney disease in relation to their reproductive health, including options to preserve fertility earlier. Other health conditions with established personalised reproductive care packages, for example, cancer, could be used to benchmark kidney practice alongside the new model developed here.

Keywords: chronic renal failure; nephrology; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reproductive options, choices and broader implications on decision-making—health system model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. *Includes back-chaining through other reviews including Tong et al and an author search on Allison Tong. **Separate search with MEDLINE.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Satveit S. Addressing the unique healthcare needs of women: opportunity for change exists at the intersection of precision health and learning health systems. Learn Health Syst 2018;2:e10033. 10.1002/lrh2.10033 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sue M. Reproductive health and wellbeing – addressing unmet needs [online]. Available: https://www.bma.org.uk/media/2114/bma-womens-reproductive-health-report-... [Accessed 2 Dec 2021].
    1. World Kidney Day . Kidney disease & women [online]. Available: https://www.worldkidneyday.org/facts/kidney-disease-women/ [Accessed 9 May 2022].
    1. Carrero JJ, Hecking M, Chesnaye NC, et al. . Sex and gender disparities in the epidemiology and outcomes of chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2018;14:151–64. 10.1038/nrneph.2017.181 - DOI - PubMed
    1. The BMJ . Women’s health and gender inequalities [online]. Available: https://www.bmj.com/gender [Accessed 2 Dec 2021].

Publication types