Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 8;13(1):4631.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32324-x.

COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccine induces transient CD8+ T effector cell responses while conserving the memory pool for subsequent reactivation

Affiliations

COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccine induces transient CD8+ T effector cell responses while conserving the memory pool for subsequent reactivation

Matthias Reinscheid et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Immunization with two mRNA vaccine doses elicits robust spike-specific CD8+ T cell responses, but reports of waning immunity after COVID-19 vaccination prompt the introduction of booster vaccination campaigns. However, the effect of mRNA booster vaccination on the spike-specific CD8+ T cell response remains unclear. Here we show that spike-specific CD8+ T cells are activated and expanded in all analyzed individuals receiving the 3rd and 4th mRNA vaccine shots. This CD8+ T cell boost response is followed by a contraction phase and lasts only for about 30-60 days. The spike-specific CD8+ T memory stem cell pool is not affected by the 3rd vaccination. Both 4th vaccination and breakthrough infections with Delta and Omicron rapidly reactivate CD8+ T memory cells. In contrast, neutralizing antibody responses display little boost effect towards Omicron. Thus, COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccination elicits a transient T effector cell response while long-term spike-specific CD8+ T cell immunity is conserved to mount robust memory recall targeting emerging variants of concern.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Cellular and humoral effector response after the 3rd vaccine dose.
Calculated ex vivo frequencies of spike-specific CD8+ T cells throughout 1st, 2nd and 3rd vaccination (a). Ki-67,and CD38 expression within spike-specific non-naïve CD8+ T cells (b). t-SNE representation of flow cytometry data comparing A*01/S865- and A*02/S269-specific CD8+ T cells at peak response after 1st, 2nd and 3rd vaccination. Expression levels of CD38, T-BET, BCL-2, PD-1 and TOX are depicted (c). Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA with main model (a, b) comparing the effects of targeted epitopes (pe) and of the time course (pt). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Humoral response after the 3rd vaccine dose.
Antibody neutralization activity as 50% plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT50) for SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1, B.1.617.2 and B.1.1.529 after 3rd vaccination. Median values are depicted with 95% confidence interval error bars with n = 28 individual tested (a). Quantification of serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG levels following 3rd vaccination with n = 26 individuals tested (b). Calculated ex vivo frequencies of A*01/S865- (left) and A*02/S269-specific (right) CD8+ T cells, with antibody neutralization activity after 4th vaccination (c). Median values are depicted with 95% confidence interval error bars. Statistical significance was calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test (a) comparing the effects of time course (pt < 1×10−14). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Spike-specific CD8+ T memory cells before and after the 3rd vaccine dose.
Composition of spike-specific CD8+ T cell memory subsets at 3 (n = 7) and 9 (n = 11) months after 2nd, and 3 (n = 11) months after 3rd vaccination (a). Molecule expression of spike-specific non-naïve CD8+ T cells at 3 (n = 8) and 9 (n = 12) months after 2nd, and 3 (n = 11) months after 3rd vaccination normalized to bulk naïve CD8+ T cells (b). Calculated ex vivo frequencies of BCL-2hi (c) and TSCM (d) spike-specific CD8+ T cells. t-SNE representation of BCL-2hi (e) and TSCM (f) spike-specific CD8+ T cells at 3 and 9 months after 2nd, and 3 months after 3rd vaccination. Expression levels of CCR7, TCF-1 and T-BET are depicted for BCL-2hi, and CD127, CD11a, CXCR3 and CD27 are depicted for TSCM spike-specific CD8+ T cells. Statistical significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA with full model and Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (a, b) to examine the effect of sampling time points (pt) on memory subsets and marker expression, and two-way ANOVA with main model (c, d) to compare the effects of targeted epitopes (pe) and time course (pt). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Reactivation capacity of spike-specific CD8+ T cells before and after the 3rd vaccine dose.
Calculated ex vivo frequencies of TCF-1+ non-naive spike-specific CD8+ T cells (a). Expansion capacity of spike-specific CD8+ T cells over 14 days of in vitro expansion throughout 1st, 2nd and 3rd vaccination (b). Percentage of IFNγ and TNF (c), and CD107a (d) producing CD8+ T cells upon peptide stimulation related to the percentage of spike-specific CD8+ T cells from all CD8+ T cells at 3 (n = 10) and 9 (n = 12 for c, n = 11 for d) months post 2nd, and 3 (n = 11) months post 3rd vaccination after in vitro expansion. Median values are depicted with 95% confidence interval error bars. Expression of Granzyme B (e) and Perforin (f) of spike-specific CD8+ T cells at 3 (n = 6) and 9 (n = 12) months post 2nd, and 3 months (n = 10 for e, n = 11 for f) post 3rd vaccination after in vitro expansion with representative histograms. Median values are depicted with 95% confidence interval error bars. Statistical significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA with main model (a, b) to compare the effects of targeted epitopes (pe) and time course (pt), two-way ANOVA with full model and Tukey’s multiple comparison test (c), and Kruskal-Wallis test (d, e, f) to examine the effect of sampling time on functionality (pt). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. CD8+ T effector cell response after breakthrough infection and the 4th vaccine dose.
Calculated ex vivo frequencies of spike-specific CD8+ T cells before and after breakthrough infection and 4th vaccination (a). Proportion of CD38+, Ki-67+ and T-BEThi within non-naive spike-specific CD8+ T cells at peak expansion after breakthrough infection and 4th vaccination with n = 11 for Omicron and n = 2 for Delta breakthrough infections, and n = 4 individuals receiving a 4th vaccination (b). Statistical significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA with main model to compare the effects of antigen triggers (pa) on epitope-specific T cell frequencies (a) and two-way ANOVA with full model and Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (b) to examine the effects of antigen triggers on activation marker expression. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Characterization of CD8+ T memory cells after breakthrough infection and the 4th vaccine dose.
Reactivation capacity of spike-specific CD8+ T cells 1 month after symptom onset and 4th vaccination. Median values are depicted with 95% confidence interval error bars with n = 6 for Omicron and n = 2 for Delta breakthrough infections, and n = 4 individuals receiving a 4th vaccination (a). t-SNE representation of spike-specific CD8+ T cells 1 month after symptom onset and 4th vaccination. Expression levels of CD38, CCR7, TCF- and BCL-2 are depicted (b). Calculated ex vivo frequencies of BCL-2hi non-naïve spike-specific CD8+ T cells before and after breakthrough infection and 4th vaccination (c). Antibody neutralization activity as 50% plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT50) for SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1, B.1.617.2 and B.1.1.529 after breakthrough infection and 4th vaccination with n = 11 for Omicron and n = 1 for Delta breakthrough infection, and n = 2 individuals receiving a 4th vaccination (d). Statistical significance was calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test (a) to compare the effect of the antigen triggers on expansion (pexp) and interferon production (pinf) and two-way ANOVA with main model (c, d) to compare the effects of antigen triggers (pa) on epitope-specific T cell frequencies (c) or the effects of VOCs (pv) and time course (pt). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Krammer F. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. Nature. 2020;586:516–527. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2798-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalimuddin S, et al. Early T cell and binding antibody responses are associated with COVID-19 RNA vaccine efficacy onset. Med (N. Y) 2021;2:682–688 e684. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oberhardt V, et al. Rapid and stable mobilization of CD8+ T cells by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Nature. 2021;597:268–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03841-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Painter MM, et al. Rapid induction of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells is associated with coordinated humoral and cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Immunity. 2021;54:2133–2142 e2133. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.08.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sahin U, et al. BNT162b2 vaccine induces neutralizing antibodies and poly-specific T cells in humans. Nature. 2021;595:572–577. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03653-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types