Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;18(1):e12496.
doi: 10.1111/opn.12496. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mobility of older adults: A scoping review

Sarah Giulia Bandeira Felipe  1 , Patrícia Parreira Batista  2 , Cristina Cristóvão Ribeiro da Silva  3 , Ruth Caldeira de Melo  4 , Daniela de Assumpção  1 , Monica Rodrigues Perracini  1   5
Affiliations

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mobility of older adults: A scoping review

Sarah Giulia Bandeira Felipe et al. Int J Older People Nurs. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To identify the most frequent determinants of contact limitation on older adults' mobility addressed by the recommendations to mitigate mobility limitation during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify the recommendations characteristics and means of dissemination that might guide coping actions.

Background: Measures for physical contact restriction were implemented to prevent COVID-19 spread. These measures directly impacted older people, reducing their mobility, especially outside home environment. Health systems worldwide need to be prepared to implement strategies to mitigate negative effects of reduced mobility in this population.

Design: Scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework.

Method: Therefore, a scoping review was conducted in LILACS, CINAHL, MEDLINE, WEB OF SCIENCE and SCOPUS databases. Documents and reports with recommendations from government agencies were also consulted. Results were presented in a narrative synthesis based on a conceptual model of mobility proposed by Webber (The Gerontologist, 2010, 50, 443) regarding the most frequently addressed determinants, characteristics of the proposed interventions, and means of dissemination for the older person population.

Findings: Twenty-eight studies were selected for the final sample. According to Webber's model, most articles (n = 14) presented the impacts on mobility from the perspective of physical determinants, relating this aspect to biological losses in the musculoskeletal system, and a minority assessed mobility in vital spaces, encompassing environmental (n = 3) and financial (n = 1) determinants. Also, the most frequent recommendation was that physical activity promotes maintenance of mobility and prevents the occurrence of adverse results, such as falls, fractures and functional decline. As to dissemination, digital technologies were recognised as a strategy to motivate, instruct and monitor exercise practice to increase mobility in older adults.

Conclusion: The main conditions related to the decline in mobility of older adults during COVID-19 pandemic were physical inactivity and sedentary lifestyle. The practice of physical activity is widespread and needs to be adapted according to individual needs. Finally, digital technologies are essential tools in this period, but other alternatives should also be considered for low-income seniors.

Implications for practice: It is hoped that the gaps identified through this scoping review can help enhance the discussion on the broader assessment of mobility in older adults and the design of interventions when contact restriction is a reality.

Keywords: COVID-19; ageing; locomotion; mobility; older adults; physical contact restriction; social isolation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Consequences of contact restriction measures to prevent COVID‐19 on mobility determinants. Teresina, Piauí, Brazil, 2021
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flowchart for studies selection, PRISMA‐ScR (2020). Teresina, Piauí, Brazil, 2021
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Methodological approaches of articles included in the scoping review. Teresina, Piauí, Brazil, 2021
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Graphic representation of the impacts of contact restriction measures on physical determinants of mobility of older adults and its consequences. Teresina, Piauí, Brazil, 2021
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abrahams, C. (2020). The impact of COVID‐19 to date on older people's mental and physical health. Age UK.
    1. Arksey, H. , & O'malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19–32.
    1. Aubertin‐Leheudre, M. , & Rolland, Y. (2020). The importance of physical activity to Care for Frail Older Adults during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21, 973–976. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aung, M. N. , Yuasa, M. , Koyanagi, Y. , Aung, T. N. N. , Moolphate, S. , Matsumoto, H. , & Yoshioka, T. (2020). Sustainable health promotion for the seniors during COVID‐19 outbreak: A lesson from Tokyo. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 14, 328–331. - PubMed
    1. Baker, P. S. , Bodner, E. V. , & Allman, R. M. (2003). Measuring life‐space mobility in community‐dwelling older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 1610–1614. - PubMed

Publication types