Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):1014.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08188-8.

The magnitude and perceived reasons for childhood cancer treatment abandonment in Ethiopia: from health care providers' perspective

Affiliations

The magnitude and perceived reasons for childhood cancer treatment abandonment in Ethiopia: from health care providers' perspective

Mizan Kiros Mirutse et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Treatment abandonment is one of major reasons for childhood cancer treatment failure and low survival rate in low- and middle-income countries. Ethiopia plans to reduce abandonment rate by 60% (2019-2023), but baseline data and information about the contextual risk factors that influence treatment abandonment are scarce.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from September 5 to 22, 2021, on the three major pediatric oncology centers in Ethiopia. Data on the incidence and reasons for treatment abandonment were obtained from healthcare professionals. We were unable to obtain data about the patients' or guardians' perspective because the information available in the cancer registry was incomplete to contact adequate number of respondents. We used a validated, semi-structured questionnaire developed by the International Society of Pediatric Oncology Abandonment Technical Working Group. We included all (N = 38) health care professionals (physicians, nurses, and social workers) working at these centers who had more than one year of experience in childhood cancer service provision (a universal sampling and 100% response rate).

Results: The perceived mean abandonment rate in Ethiopia is 34% (SE 2.5%). The risk of treatment abandonment is dependent on the type of cancer (high for bone sarcoma and brain tumor), the phase of treatment and treatment outcome. The highest risk is during maintenance and treatment failure or relapse for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and during pre- or post-surgical phase for Wilms tumor and bone sarcoma. The major influencing risk factors in Ethiopia includes high cost of care, low economic status, long travel time to treatment centers, long waiting time, belief in the incurability of cancer and poor public awareness about childhood cancer.

Conclusions: The perceived abandonment rate in Ethiopia is high, and the risk of abandonment varies according to the type of cancer, phase of treatment or treatment outcome. Therefore, mitigation strategies to reduce the abandonment rate should include identifying specific risk factors and prioritizing strategies based on their level of influence, effectiveness, feasibility, and affordability.

Keywords: Childhood cancer; Ethiopia; Low-income countries; Sub-Saharan Africa; Treatment abandonment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Risk of treatment abandonment by childhood cancer type
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Abandonment risk associated with childhood cancer treatment phases and outcomes
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Risk factors associated with treatment abandonment
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Availability of essential childhood cancer treatment interventions at oncology centers

References

    1. Ward ZJ, Yeh JM, Bhakta N, Frazier AL, Atun R. Estimating the total incidence of global childhood cancer: a simulation-based analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(4):483–493. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30909-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez-Galindo C, Friedrich P, Alcasabas P, Antillon F, Banavali S, Castillo L, et al. Toward the cure of all children with cancer through collaborative efforts: pediatric oncology as a global challenge. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(27):3065–3073. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.6376. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magrath I, Steliarova-Foucher E, Epelman S, Ribeiro RC, Harif M, Li C-K, et al. Paediatric cancer in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Oncology. 2013;14(3):e104–e116. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70008-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gelband H, Jha P, Sankaranarayanan R, Horton S. Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition : Volume 3. Cancer. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2015 - PubMed
    1. Pui C-H, Pei D, Pappo AS, Howard SC, Cheng C, Sandlund JT, et al. Treatment outcomes in black and white children with cancer: results from the SEER database and St Jude Children's Research Hospital, 1992 through 2007. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(16):2005–2012. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.8617. - DOI - PMC - PubMed