Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2740-2743.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7241. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

Responding to Food Industry Initiatives to Be "Part of the Solution" Comment on "'Part of the Solution': Food Corporation Strategies for Regulatory Capture and Legitimacy"

Affiliations
Comment

Responding to Food Industry Initiatives to Be "Part of the Solution" Comment on "'Part of the Solution': Food Corporation Strategies for Regulatory Capture and Legitimacy"

Nicholas Freudenberg. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

In response to growing concerns about chronic diseases, food insecurity, low-wage food labor, and global warming, the food industry has developed new strategies to respond to its critics and pursue its business and political goals. As Lacy-Nicholas and Williams described in a recent review, the food industry has expanded its repertoire from opposition to critics to appeasement, co-option, and partnerships.1 Defining themselves as "part of the solution," the food industry seeks to disarm its opponents, shift policy debates to favor its interests, or delay decisions that jeopardize its profits or power. This commentary explores how health professionals, can respond to this changing repertoire. Lessons from previous campaigns to control harmful industry practices,2 suggest that no single strategy will counter changing food industry efforts to achieve its goals. Thus, advocates must consider a portfolio of approaches that can be deployed in response to changing circumstances, industry tactics, and threats to health.

Keywords: Commercial Determinants; Food Industry; Food Policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author declares that he has no competing interests.

Comment on

References

    1. Lacy-Nichols J, Williams O. “Part of the solution”: food corporation strategies for regulatory capture and legitimacy. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;10(12):845–856. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freudenberg N. Lethal but Legal Corporations, Consumption and Protecting Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.
    1. Malone RE, Grundy Q, Bero LA. Tobacco industry denormalisation as a tobacco control intervention: a review. Tob Control. 2012;21(2):162–170. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050200. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alkon AH, Guthman J. The New Food Activism: Opposition, Cooperation, and Collective Action. San Francisco: University of California Press; 2017.
    1. Corporate Accountability International. Clowning with Kid’s Health: A Case for Ronald Mcdonald’s Retirement. Corporate Accountability International; 2017. https://www.corporateaccountability.org/resources/case-ronald-mcdonalds-.... Accessed March 15, 2022.

LinkOut - more resources