Randomized controlled trial between conventional versus sutureless bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement: Impact of mini and full sternotomy access at 1-year follow-up
- PMID: 35944771
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.08.012
Randomized controlled trial between conventional versus sutureless bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement: Impact of mini and full sternotomy access at 1-year follow-up
Abstract
Background: The present study is a sub-analysis of the multicenter, randomized PERSIST-AVR trial (PERceval Sutureless Implant versus Standard Aortic Valve Replacement) comparing the in-hospital and 1-year results of sutureless versus conventional stented bioprostheses in isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) within two different surgical approaches: mini-sternotomy (MS) and full-sternotomy (FS).
Methods: A total of 819 patients (per-protocol population) underwent preoperative randomization to sutureless or stented biological valve at 47 centers worldwide. Sub-analysis on isolated SAVR was performed. Results were compared between sutureless and stented within the two different surgical approaches.
Results: 285 patients were implanted with Perceval (67% in MS) and 293 with stented valves (65% in MS). Sutureless group showed significantly reduced surgical times both in FS and MS. In-hospital results show no differences between Perceval and stented valves in FS, while a lower incidence of new-onset of atrial fibrillation (3.7% vs 10.8%) with Perceval in MS. After 1-year, use of sutureless valve showed a significant reduction of MACCE (5.2% vs 10.8%), stroke rate (1.0% vs 5.4%), new-onset of atrial fibrillation (4.2% vs 11.4%) and re-hospitalizations (21.8 days vs 47.6 days), compared to stented valves but presented higher rate of pacemaker implantation (11% vs 1.6%).
Conclusions: Sutureless bioprosthesis showed significantly reduced procedural times during isolated SAVR in both surgical approaches. Patients with sutureless valves and MS access showed also better 1-year outcome regarding MACCEs, stroke, re-hospitalization and new-onset atrial fibrillation, but presented a higher rate of permanent pacemaker implantation compared to patients with stented bioprosthesis.
Keywords: Aortic valve replacement; Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement; Sutureless aortic valve.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Single Technology Assessment of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. PMID: 29553663 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Sutureless versus Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized PERSIST-AVR Study Design.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;68(2):114-123. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675847. Epub 2018 Nov 29. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 30497085 Clinical Trial.
-
Aortic Valve Replacement with a Conventional Stented Bioprosthesis versus Sutureless Bioprosthesis: a Study of 763 Patients.Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Mar-Apr;33(2):122-128. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0088. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29898140 Free PMC article.
-
Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49(1):220-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv014. Epub 2015 Feb 3. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 25653252
-
Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 16;7(4):e006091. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006091. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29453309 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Conventional Biological versus Sutureless Aortic Valve Prostheses in Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement.Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 9;13(3):737. doi: 10.3390/life13030737. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36983892 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Use-Rates of and Scientific Evidence on Sutureless Devices in Aortic Valve Replacement: A Bibliographic Meta-Analysis and Clinical Considerations.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 7;14(12):4049. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124049. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40565793 Free PMC article.
-
The Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve: Evolution of Surgical Valve Technology.Innovations (Phila). 2024 Mar-Apr;19(2):125-135. doi: 10.1177/15569845241231989. Epub 2024 Mar 11. Innovations (Phila). 2024. PMID: 38465600 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Less Is More? Combined Approaches to Improve Mortality and Morbidity after Aortic Valve Replacement.Biomedicines. 2023 Nov 7;11(11):2989. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11112989. Biomedicines. 2023. PMID: 38001989 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Perceval Valves in Older Patients: A Systematic Review.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 28;26(7):39463. doi: 10.31083/RCM39463. eCollection 2025 Jul. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025. PMID: 40776953 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical