Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Mar;38(4):1001-1007.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07742-8. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

Patterns of Healthcare Utilization and Spending Among Homebound Older Adults in the USA: an Observational Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Patterns of Healthcare Utilization and Spending Among Homebound Older Adults in the USA: an Observational Study

Benjamin H Oseroff et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Homebound older adults have complex social, medical, and financial needs, but little is known about their healthcare utilization and spending.

Objective: To characterize healthcare utilization and spending among homebound older adults.

Design: Cohort study using National Health and Aging Trends Study data linked to Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) claims data.

Participants: Adults aged 70 years and older with Medicare FFS coverage (n = 6468).

Main measures: In a person-year analysis, survey-weighted rates and adjusted marginal differences in inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department utilization and spending 12 months post-interview were calculated by homebound status, defined as reporting never or rarely (no more than 1 day/week) leaving home in the last month.

Key results: Compared to the non-homebound, homebound observations had lower annual unadjusted rates of accessing primary care (60.9% vs 71.9%, p < 0.001) and specialist care (61.0% vs 74.9%, p < 0.001) and higher annual rates of emergency department use (54.0% vs 32.6%, p < 0.001) and hospitalization (39.8% vs 19.8%, p < 0.001). Total annual Medicare spending was $11,346 higher among the homebound compared to the non-homebound (p < 0.001). In a single year analysis (2015), homebound older adults accounted for 11.0% of Medicare spending among those over 70 despite making up only 5.7% of this population. 13.6% of the homebound were in the 95th percentile or above of Medicare spending in 2015. In models adjusting for demographic, clinical, and geographic characteristics, homebound status was associated with a decreased likelihood of having an annual primary care or specialist visit and $2226 additional total annual Medicare spending.

Conclusions: Homebound older adults use more hospital-based care and less outpatient care than the non-homebound, contributing to higher levels of overall Medicare spending.

Keywords: homebound; medicare; spending; utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percent of Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries aged 70 and over with any health care utilization by category and homebound status, 2011–2017. Note: Authors’ calculations using the 2011–2016 National Health and Aging Trends Study linked with Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data (n = 18,899 person year observations). Any utilization is defined as one or more admissions/visits for each category. Estimates are survey weighted percentages.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average Medicare Fee-for-Service spending among adults aged 70 and over by billing category and homebound status, 2011–2017. Note: Authors’ calculations using the 2011–2016 National Health and Aging Trends Study linked with Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data (n = 18,899 person year observations). Estimates are survey weighted averages CPI-U inflation adjusted to 2017 dollars.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Adjusted percentage point difference in the probability of any healthcare utilization among Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries aged 70 and older by category and homebound status, 2011–2017. Note: Hb = homebound. Authors’ calculations using the 2011–2016 National Health and Aging Trends Study linked with Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data (n = 18,899 person year observations). Estimates are marginal differences from survey weighted logistic regression and 95% confidence intervals adjusted for sex, race, age, education, marital status, geographic region, metropolitan area, functional status, Medicaid enrollment, probable dementia, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harris-Kojetin L, Sengupta M, Lendon J, Rome V, Valverde R, Caffrey C. Long-Term Care Providers and Services Users in the UNited States, 2015-2016. National Center for Health STatistics; 2019. Report No.: 3(43). - PubMed
    1. Ornstein KA, Leff B, Covinsky KE, Ritchie CS, Federman AD, Roberts L, Kelley AS, Siu AL, Szanton SL. Epidemiology of the homebound population in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1180. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1849. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaye HS. Toward a model long-term services and supports system: state policy elements. Gerontologist. 2014;54(5):754–761. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ornstein KA, Garrido MM, Bollens-Lund E, Husain M, Ferreira K, Kelley AS, Siu AL. Estimation of the incident homebound population in the US among older Medicare beneficiaries, 2012 to 2018. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(7):1022. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1636. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ankuda CK, Leff B, Ritchie CS, Siu AL, Ornstein KA. Association of the COVID-19 pandemic with the prevalence of homebound older adults in the United States, 2011-2020. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(12):1658–1660. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2783103 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types