Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 9;22(1):143.
doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00703-8.

A case study to investigate the impact of overcrowding indices in emergency departments

Affiliations

A case study to investigate the impact of overcrowding indices in emergency departments

Giovanni Improta et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is widespread in hospitals in many countries, causing severe consequences to patient outcomes, staff work and the system, with an overall increase in costs. Therefore, health managers are constantly looking for new preventive and corrective measures to counter this phenomenon. To do this, however, it is necessary to be able to characterize the problem objectively. For this reason, various indices are used in the literature to assess ED crowding. In this work, we explore the use of two of the most widespread crowding indices in an ED of an Italian national hospital, investigate their relationships and discuss their effectiveness.

Methods: In this study, two of the most widely used indices in the literature, the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS) and the Emergency Department Working Index (EDWIN), were analysed to characterize overcrowding in the ED of A.O.R.N. "A. Cardarelli" of Naples, which included 1678 clinical cases. The measurement was taken every 15 minutes for a period of 7 days.

Results: The results showed consistency in the use of EDWIN and NEDOCS indices as measures of overcrowding, especially in severe overcrowding conditions. Indeed, in the examined case study, both EDWIN and NEDOCS showed very low rates of occurrence of severe overcrowding (2-3%). In contrast, regarding differences in the estimation of busy to overcrowded ED rates, the EDWIN index proved to be less sensitive in distinguishing these variations in the occupancy of the ED. Furthermore, within the target week considered in the study, the results show that, according to both EDWIN and NEDOCS, higher overcrowding rates occurred during the middle week rather than during the weekend. Finally, a low degree of correlation between the two indices was found.

Conclusions: The effectiveness of both EDWIN and NEDOCS in measuring ED crowding and overcrowding was investigated, and the main differences and relationships in the use of the indices are highlighted. While both indices are useful ED performance metrics, they are not always interchangeable, and their combined use could provide more details in understanding ED dynamics and possibly predicting future critical conditions, thus enhancing ED management.

Keywords: ED evaluation indices; Emergency department work index (EDWIN); National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS); Overcrowding in emergency department (ED).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
NEDOCS index values for the emergency department at the hospital “A. Cardarelli” hospital over a period of 7 days
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
NEDOCS index values for March 14th, 2016
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
EDWIN index values for the emergency department at the hospital “A. Cardarelli” hospital over a period of 7 days
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
EDWIN index values for March 14th, 2016
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison between the Emergency Department Work Index (EDWIN) results and the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS) results for a selected day (March 14th, 2016). A linear regression curve (dashed line) is displayed to show the slight monotonic relationship between the two indices

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rasouli HR, Esfahani AA, Nobakht M, et al. Outcomes of crowding in emergency departments; a systematic review. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019;7(1):e52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelen GD, et al. Emergency department crowding: the canary in the health care system. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery. 2021;2(5).
    1. Di Laura D, et al. Efficiency measures of emergency departments: an Italian systematic literature review. BMJ open quality. 2021;10(3):e001058. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Volochtchuk AV, Lachowski; Leite, Higor. Process improvement approaches in emergency departments: a review of the current knowledge. Int J Qual Reliabil Manag. 2021.
    1. Ponsiglione AM, et al. A comprehensive review of techniques for processing and analyzing fetal heart rate signals. Sensors. 2021;21(18):6136. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources