Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;70(12):3378-3389.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.17980. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

Peri-procedural code status for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Absence of program policies and standard practices

Gwen M Bernacki  1   2   3 , Helene Starks  2   4 , Ashok Krishnaswami  5   6   7 , Jill M Steiner  1   2 , Matthew B Allen  8 , Wayne B Batchelor  9 , Eugene Yang  1 , Janet Wyman  10 , James N Kirkpatrick  1   2   7
Affiliations

Peri-procedural code status for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Absence of program policies and standard practices

Gwen M Bernacki et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Little is known about policies and practices for patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) who have a documented preference for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status at time of referral. We investigated how practices across TAVR programs align with goals of care for patients presenting with DNR status.

Methods: Between June and September 2019, we conducted semi-structured interviews with TAVR coordinators from 52/73 invited programs (71%) in Washington and California (TAVR volume > 100/year:34%; 50-99:36%; 1-50:30%); 2 programs reported no TAVR in 2018. TAVR coordinators described peri-procedural code status policies and practices and how they accommodate patients' goals of care. We used data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry, stratified by programs' DNR practice, to examine differences in program size, patient characteristics and risk status, and outcomes.

Results: Nearly all TAVR programs (48/50: 96%) addressed peri-procedural code status, yet only 26% had established policies. Temporarily rescinding DNR status until after TAVR was the norm (78%), yet time frames for reinstatement varied (38% <48 h post-TAVR; 44% 48 h-to-discharge; 18% >30 days post-discharge). For patients with fluctuating code status, no routine practices for discharge documentation were well-described. No clinically substantial differences by code status practice were noted in Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality risk score, peri-procedural or in-hospital cardiac arrest, or hospice disposition. Six programs maintaining DNR status recognized TAVR as a palliative procedure. Among programs categorically reversing patients' DNR status, the rationale for differing lengths of time to reinstatement reflect divergent views on accountability and reporting requirements.

Conclusions: Marked heterogeneity exists in management of peri-procedural code status across TAVR programs, including timeframe for reestablishing DNR status post-procedure. These findings call for standardization of DNR decisions at specific care points (before/during/after TAVR) to ensure consistent alignment with patients' health-related goals and values.

Keywords: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; do not resuscitate; palliative care; peri-procedural; policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Program Peri-procedural Code Status Practices
Figure 2
Figure 2
DNR Peri-procedural Code Status Practice by TAVR Program Size, Location and Teaching Program
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al., Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery. N Engl J Med, 2010. 363(17): p. 1597–1607. - PubMed
    1. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al., Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med, 2011. 364(23): p. 2187–98. - PubMed
    1. American College of Cardiology’s Cardiosmart: A decision aid for treatment options for severe aortic stenosis for patients deciding between TAVR and surgery. November 19, 2021]; Available from: https://www.cardiosmart.org/topics/aortic-stenosis/assets/decision-aid/c....
    1. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al., Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med, 2016. 374(17): p. 1609–20. - PubMed
    1. Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, et al., Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med, 2017. 376(14): p. 1321–1331. - PubMed

Publication types