Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Dec;12(6):e12545.
doi: 10.1111/cob.12545. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

Interventions for reducing weight bias in healthcare providers: An interprofessional systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interventions for reducing weight bias in healthcare providers: An interprofessional systematic review and meta-analysis

Caroline Hallen Moore et al. Clin Obes. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Weight bias is prevalent in many healthcare disciplines and negatively impacts the quality of care for patients with obesity. This warrants interventions to reduce weight bias shown by providers to improve care for individuals with obesity. However, past reviews have identified only marginal success in improving the attitudes and beliefs of healthcare providers about individuals with obesity. This systematic review and meta-analysis identifies and synthesizes recent peer-reviewed intervention studies aimed at reducing weight bias in healthcare students and professionals. The databases Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsychINFO, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed studies published between 2016 and August 2021. Search terms included a combination of surrogate terms for the concepts of weight bias, intervention and healthcare students or professionals. The search yielded 1136 articles, and 14 articles met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Nineteen effect sizes from nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the interventions in the included studies result in a 0.38 SD reduction (Hedge's g) in obesity-bias with 95% confidence intervals from -0.52 to -0.24, indicating a small to moderate effect size in the reduction of weight bias. Most studies included students and focused on evoking empathy or educating on the causality/controllability of obesity. Measurement tools, intervention type, limitations of the studies and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Keywords: health care; interventions; obesity; stigma; weight bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. American Medical Association. H-440.842 Recognition of Obesity as a Disease. 2013. Accessed August 11, 2021. https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/obesity?uri=%2FAMA...
    1. Gujral H, Tea C, Sheridan M. Evaluation of nurse's attitudes toward adult patients of size. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):536-540. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2011.03.008
    1. Charlesworth TES, Banaji MR. Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes: I. long-term change and stability from 2007 to 2016. Psychol Sci. 2019;30(2):174-192. doi:10.1177/0956797618813087
    1. Phelan SM, Burgess DJ, Yeazel MW, Hellerstedt WL, Griffin JM, Ryn MV. Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity. Obes Rev. 2015;16(4):319-326. doi:10.1111/obr.12266
    1. Salas XR, Jewell J, Breda J. Weight Bias and Obesity Stigma: Considerations for the WHO European Region. WHO Regional Office for Europe. n.d. Accessed August 11, 2021. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/351026/WeightBias.pdf

LinkOut - more resources