Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 8;31(spe1):e2021382.
doi: 10.1590/SS2237-9622202200011.especial. eCollection 2022.

Indicators of the line of care for people with diabetes in Brazil: National Health Survey 2013 and 2019

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations

Indicators of the line of care for people with diabetes in Brazil: National Health Survey 2013 and 2019

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Deborah Carvalho Malta et al. Epidemiol Serv Saude. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare health care indicators for adults with medical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) in Brazil, in 2013 and 2019, and analyze the indicators for 2019 according to sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods: Cross-sectional study using data from the 2013 and 2019 National Health Survey. Care indicators were evaluated in people with medical diagnosis of DM.

Results: DM prevalence increased from 6.2% (2013) to 7.7% (2019). Between 2013 and 2019, there was an increase in the use of medications (from 80.2% to 88.8%) and of medical care (from 73.2% to 79.1%), a reduction in the use of Popular Pharmacy Program medications (from 57.4% to 51.5%) and in follow-up with the same physician (from 65.2% to 59.4%). In 2019, poorer indicators were observed for individuals who were male, younger, Black and Brown, and with lower education and income.

Conclusion: Most indicators remained similar in the last five years, with differences according to sociodemographic characteristics in 2019.

Objetivo: Comparar indicadores de cuidado assistencial em adultos com diagnóstico médico de diabetes mellitus (DM) no Brasil em 2013 e 2019, e analisar esses indicadores, em 2019, segundo características sociodemográficas.

Métodos: Estudo transversal com dados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde de 2013 e 2019. Foram avaliados os indicadores de cuidado em pessoas com diagnóstico médico de DM.

Resultados: A prevalência de DM aumentou de 6,2% (2013) para 7,7% (2019). Entre 2013 e 2019, ocorreu aumento no uso de medicamentos (de 80,2% para 88,8%) e de assistência médica (de 73,2% para 79,1%), houve redução no uso de medicamentos da Farmácia Popular (de 57,4% para 51,5%) e no acompanhamento com mesmo médico (de 65,2% para 59,4%). Em 2019, pessoas do sexo masculino, mais jovens, de raça/cor da pele preta e parda, menores escolaridade e renda apresentaram pior desempenho nos indicadores.

Conclusão: A maioria dos indicadores permaneceu semelhante durante os últimos cinco anos, com diferenças segundo características sociodemográficas em 2019.

Objetivo: Comparar indicadores de atención de salud para adultos con diagnóstico médico de diabetes mellitus (DM) en Brasil, en 2013 y 2019, y analizar estos indicadores, en 2019, según características sociodemográficas.

Métodos: Estudio transversal con datos de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud de 2013 y 2019. Se evaluaron indicadores de atención en personas con diagnóstico médico de DM.

Resultados: La prevalencia de DM aumentó del 6,2% (2013) al 7,7% (2019). Entre 2013 y 2019 hubo aumento en uso de medicamentos (80,2% a 88,8%) y de atención médica (73,2% a 79,1%), reducción en uso de medicamentos de Farmacia Popular (57, 4% a 51,5%) y seguimiento con mismo médico (65,2% a 59,4%). En 2019, personas de sexo masculino, más jóvenes, de la raza/color de piel negra y mestiza, menor nivel educativo e ingresos mostraron un peor desempeño en los indicadores.

Conclusión: La mayoría de los indicadores se mantuvieron similares durante los últimos cinco años, con diferencias según las características sociodemográficas en 2019.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Health care indicators reported by Brazilians with diabetes mellitus, in the 2013 and 2019 National Health Surveys
None
Prevalence of adults who have reported a medical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (A), and of those who have never had a blood test to measure glycaemia (B), according to sex, National Health Survey, Brazil, 2013 and 2019

References

    1. World Health Organization . Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. [10 fev 2021]. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en .
    1. Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes . Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes 2019-2020: gestão biênio 2018-2019. Clannad Editora Científica; 2019.
    1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation . GBD Compare, Viz Hub. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation; 2019. [21 jan 2021]. Disponível em: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare .
    1. Malta DC, Duncan BB, Schmidt MI, Machado IE, Silva AG, Bernal RTI, et al. Prevalência de diabetes mellitus determinada pela hemoglobina glicada na população adulta brasileira, Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde. [13 abr 2021];Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2020 22(Supl 2):e190006. 10.1590/1980-549720190006.supl.2 - PubMed
    1. Zhang P, Zhang X, Brown J, Vistisen D, Sicree R, Shaw J, et al. Global healthcare expenditure on diabetes for 2010 and 2030. [16 ago 2021];Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Mar;87(3):293–301. Disponível em: https://www.diabetesresearchclinicalpractice.com/article/S0168-8227(10)0... . - PubMed

Publication types